BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19782875)

  • 1. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.
    Ergina PL; Cook JA; Blazeby JM; Boutron I; Clavien PA; Reeves BC; Seiler CM; ; Altman DG; Aronson JK; Barkun JS; Campbell WB; Cook JA; Feldman LS; Flum DR; Glasziou P; Maddern GJ; Marshall JC; McCulloch P; Nicholl J; Strasberg SM; Meakins JL; Ashby D; Black N; Bunker J; Burton M; Campbell M; Chalkidou K; Chalmers I; de Leval M; Deeks J; Grant A; Gray M; Greenhalgh R; Jenicek M; Kehoe S; Lilford R; Littlejohns P; Loke Y; Madhock R; McPherson K; Rothwell P; Summerskill B; Taggart D; Tekkis P; Thompson M; Treasure T; Trohler U; Vandenbroucke J
    Lancet; 2009 Sep; 374(9695):1097-104. PubMed ID: 19782875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials.
    Cook JA
    Trials; 2009 Feb; 10():9. PubMed ID: 19200379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer--methods of clinical research in surgery.
    Diener MK; Simon T; Büchler MW; Seiler CM
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2012 Dec; 397(8):1193-9. PubMed ID: 21424797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Difficult ot evaluate new surgical methods. IDEAL gives better control of surgical innovation and development].
    Lundgren F; Troëng T
    Lakartidningen; 2011 May 25-31; 108(21):1178-9. PubMed ID: 21812240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.
    Barkun JS; Aronson JK; Feldman LS; Maddern GJ; Strasberg SM; ; Altman DG; Barkun JS; Blazeby JM; Boutron IC; Campbell WB; Clavien PA; Cook JA; Ergina PL; Flum DR; Glasziou P; Marshall JC; McCulloch P; Nicholl J; Reeves BC; Seiler CM; Meakins JL; Ashby D; Black N; Bunker J; Burton M; Campbell M; Chalkidou K; Chalmers I; de Leval M; Deeks J; Grant A; Gray M; Greenhalgh R; Jenicek M; Kehoe S; Lilford R; Littlejohns P; Loke Y; Madhock R; McPherson K; Rothwell P; Summerskill B; Taggart D; Tekkis P; Thompson M; Treasure T; Trohler U; Vandenbroucke J
    Lancet; 2009 Sep; 374(9695):1089-96. PubMed ID: 19782874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the role of coaching in surgery to improve learner outcomes.
    Gagnon LH; Abbasi N
    Am J Surg; 2018 Jul; 216(1):140-146. PubMed ID: 28622840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of patients and surgeons towards sham surgery trials: a protocol for a scoping review of attributes to inform a discrete choice experiment.
    Wall L; Hinwood M; Lang D; Smith A; Bunzli S; Clarke P; Choong PFM; Dowsey MM; Paolucci F
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e035870. PubMed ID: 32161162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.
    McCulloch P; Altman DG; Campbell WB; Flum DR; Glasziou P; Marshall JC; Nicholl J; ; Aronson JK; Barkun JS; Blazeby JM; Boutron IC; Campbell WB; Clavien PA; Cook JA; Ergina PL; Feldman LS; Flum DR; Maddern GJ; Nicholl J; Reeves BC; Seiler CM; Strasberg SM; Meakins JL; Ashby D; Black N; Bunker J; Burton M; Campbell M; Chalkidou K; Chalmers I; de Leval M; Deeks J; Ergina PL; Grant A; Gray M; Greenhalgh R; Jenicek M; Kehoe S; Lilford R; Littlejohns P; Loke Y; Madhock R; McPherson K; Meakins J; Rothwell P; Summerskill B; Taggart D; Tekkis P; Thompson M; Treasure T; Trohler U; Vandenbroucke J
    Lancet; 2009 Sep; 374(9695):1105-12. PubMed ID: 19782876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Benefit assessment of operative interventions from the perspective of surgical research].
    Hüttner FJ; Ulrich A; Mihaljevic AL; Probst P; Rossion I; Diener MK
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2015 Mar; 58(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 25566844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled trials for evaluating surgical questions.
    Fung EK; Loré JM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 Jun; 128(6):631-4. PubMed ID: 12049555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgery for epilepsy.
    West S; Nolan SJ; Cotton J; Gandhi S; Weston J; Sudan A; Ramirez R; Newton R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; (7):CD010541. PubMed ID: 26130264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presidential address: Controlled clinical research, opportunities and problems for the surgeon.
    Warren WD
    Am J Surg; 1974 Jan; 127(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 4586924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teaching within the operating theater.
    Carlile GS
    Perspect Biol Med; 2012; 55(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 22643721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An attitude scale for evaluating complexity of surgical procedures.
    Blendon RJ
    HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Nov; 86(11):1025-9. PubMed ID: 5138280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical research in surgery: threats and opportunities.
    Ceelen WP
    Eur Surg Res; 2014; 53(1-4):95-107. PubMed ID: 25247239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines.
    Savulescu J; Wartolowska K; Carr A
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Dec; 42(12):776-783. PubMed ID: 27777269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
    Miller D; Lewis SR; Pritchard MW; Schofield-Robinson OJ; Shelton CL; Alderson P; Smith AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD012317. PubMed ID: 30129968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.