1112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19783085)
1. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reflecting on a meta-synthesis of qualitative papers concerned with pregnant women's decision-making about prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a commentary on Reid, Sinclair, Barr, Dobbs and Crealey.
Heyman B
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1574-6; discussion 1577-9. PubMed ID: 19818542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: women's involvement in decision-making and their attitudes to screening.
Seror V; Ville Y
Prenat Diagn; 2009 Feb; 29(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 19123253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision making following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: an integrative review.
Choi H; Van Riper M; Thoyre S
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2012; 57(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 22432488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework.
Fransen MP; Essink-Bot ML; Oenema A; Mackenbach JP; Steegers EA; Wildschut HI
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Oct; 27(10):938-50. PubMed ID: 17597492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results.
Brajenović-Milić B; Babić I; Ristić S; Vraneković J; Brumini G; Kapović M
Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18180167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent for antenatal serum screening for Down syndrome.
Hwa HL; Huang LH; Hsieh FJ; Chow SN
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 49(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 20466293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'I want a choice, but I don't want to decide'--a qualitative study of pregnant women's experiences regarding early ultrasound risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies.
Aune I; Möller A
Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 21130549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey.
Gourounti K; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2008 Jun; 24(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 17316936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal testing for Down syndrome in Australia.
Lewis SM; Cullinane FM; Carlin JB; Halliday JL
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 46(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 16704474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Information disclosure when screening for trisomy 21: a decision-making aid for pregnant women?].
Seror V; Aymé S
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Feb; 30(1 Suppl):80-4. PubMed ID: 11240521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why do women decline prenatal screening and diagnosis? Australian women's perspective.
Liamputtong P; Halliday JL; Warren R; Watson F; Bell RJ
Women Health; 2003; 37(2):89-108. PubMed ID: 12733555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice.
Rowe HJ; Fisher JR; Quinlivan JA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 46(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 16953859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First-trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledge.
Dahl K; Hvidman L; Jørgensen FS; Henriques C; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel US
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 20878670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the perspective of midwives involved in offering serum screening for Down's syndrome in Northern Ireland.
McNeill J; Alderdice F
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Oct; 18(20):2888-96. PubMed ID: 19619213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are counsellors' attitudes influencing pregnant women's attitudes and decisions on prenatal screening?
van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Kleinveld JH; van Eijk JT; Knol DL; van der Wal G; van Vugt JM
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):518-24. PubMed ID: 17367105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding pregnant women's decision making concerning prenatal screening.
van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Knol DL; van Eijk JT; de Smit DJ; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
Health Psychol; 2008 Jul; 27(4):430-7. PubMed ID: 18643000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A qualitative study of pregnant women's choice of nuchal translucency measurement].
Lou S; Dahl K; Risør MB; Hvidman LE; Thomsen SG; Jørgensen FS; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel U
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):914-8. PubMed ID: 17359736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge of prenatal screening and psychological management of test decisions.
Dahl K; Hvidman L; Jørgensen FS; Kesmodel US
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 20954167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
