These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19783085)

  • 21. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pregnant women's views on how to promote the use of a decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening: a theory-informed qualitative study.
    Agbadjé TT; Menear M; Dugas M; Gagnon MP; Rahimi SA; Robitaille H; Giguère AMC; Rousseau F; Wilson BJ; Légaré F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):434. PubMed ID: 29884169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can women's autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal?
    Mullany BC; Hindin MJ; Becker S
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 15922498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions.
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):461-5. PubMed ID: 21429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pregnant women's decisions on antenatal HIV screening in Hong Kong.
    Ho CF; Loke AY
    AIDS Care; 2003 Dec; 15(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 14617503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.
    Crombag NM; Boeije H; Iedema-Kuiper R; Schielen PC; Visser GH; Bensing JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16(1):121. PubMed ID: 27229318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient decision-making for clinical genetics.
    Anderson G
    Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 17298604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458].
    Nagle C; Gunn J; Bell R; Lewis S; Meiser B; Metcalfe S; Ukoumunne OC; Halliday J
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 18190370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: are women's perceptions changing?
    Gidiri M; McFarlane J; Holding S; Lindow S
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 17378818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Women's attitudes to the successive decisions possibly involved in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: how consistent with their actual decisions?
    Seror V; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Nov; 30(11):1086-93. PubMed ID: 20872424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Women's experience of maternal serum screening.
    Carroll JC; Brown JB; Reid AJ; Pugh P
    Can Fam Physician; 2000 Mar; 46():614-20. PubMed ID: 10752000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing health care-seeking behaviours among Mayan women in Guatemala.
    Schooley J; Mundt C; Wagner P; Fullerton J; O'Donnell M
    Midwifery; 2009 Aug; 25(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 18053623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting.
    Raynes-Greenow CH; Roberts CL; Barratt A; Brodrick B; Peat B
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 15177862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review.
    Hadjigeorgiou E; Kouta C; Papastavrou E; Papadopoulos I; Mårtensson LB
    Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 21683487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Congenital anomalies: parents' anxiety and women's concerns before prenatal testing and women's opinions towards the risk factors.
    Sahin NH; Gungor I
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 18279286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation.
    Huang WH; Shih SF; Lin CL; Liu CH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jul; 20(1):407. PubMed ID: 32664895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
    Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
    Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increasing screening uptake amongst those intending to be screened: the use of action plans.
    Michie S; Dormandy E; Marteau TM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Nov; 55(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 15530757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing?
    Remennick L
    Sociol Health Illn; 2006 Jan; 28(1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16509941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.