These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective. Tilche A; Galatola M Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process. Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CO2 abatement costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation by different biogas conversion pathways. Rehl T; Müller J J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():13-25. PubMed ID: 23201601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Pucker J; Jungmeier G; Siegl S; Pötsch EM Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():283-91. PubMed ID: 23739470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing GHG emissions, ecological footprint, and water linkage for different fuels. Chavez-Rodriguez MF; Nebra SA Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9252-7. PubMed ID: 21105738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of a large-scale vertically integrated organic dairy in the United States. Heller MC; Keoleian GA Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(5):1903-10. PubMed ID: 21348530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Roberts KG; Gloy BA; Joseph S; Scott NR; Lehmann J Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(2):827-33. PubMed ID: 20030368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China. Zhao W; van der Voet E; Zhang Y; Huppes G Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1517-26. PubMed ID: 19068268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor. Keller J; Hartley K Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biogas recovery from a temperate climate covered anaerobic pond. Heubeck S; Craggs RJ Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):1019-26. PubMed ID: 20182082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the environmental burdens of anaerobic digestion in comparison to alternative options for managing the biodegradable fraction of municipal solid wastes. Haight M Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):553-9. PubMed ID: 16180477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Weiland P Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 85(4):849-60. PubMed ID: 19777226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste - A Swedish full-scale case study. Bernstad A; la Cour Jansen J Waste Manag; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1879-96. PubMed ID: 21511455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use. Fine P; Hadas E Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():289-99. PubMed ID: 22209373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy- and CO2-reduction potentials by anaerobic treatment of wastewater and organic kitchen wastes in consideration of different climatic conditions. Weichgrebe D; Urban I; Friedrich K Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 18701789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. Starr K; Gabarrell X; Villalba G; Talens L; Lombardi L Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 22230660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England. Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]