These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19783495)

  • 1. Shear modulus decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance elastography.
    Kwon OI; Park C; Nam HS; Woo EJ; Seo JK; Glaser KJ; Manduca A; Ehman RL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1526-33. PubMed ID: 19783495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.
    Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Arani A; Lake DS; Glaser KJ; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 27016276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Requirements for accurate estimation of shear modulus by magnetic resonance elastography: A computational comparative study.
    Hu L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Aug; 192():105437. PubMed ID: 32182441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analytical Minimization-Based Regularized Subpixel Shear-Wave Tracking for Ultrasound Elastography.
    Horeh MD; Asif A; Rivaz H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):285-296. PubMed ID: 30530321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative imaging of nonlinear shear modulus by combining static elastography and shear wave elastography.
    Latorre-Ossa H; Gennisson JL; De Brosses E; Tanter M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):833-9. PubMed ID: 22547295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling shear modulus distribution in magnetic resonance elastography with piecewise constant level sets.
    Li BN; Chui CK; Ong SH; Numano T; Washio T; Homma K; Chang S; Venkatesh S; Kobayashi E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):390-401. PubMed ID: 22245696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of three-dimensional integral-type reconstruction formula for magnetic resonance elastography.
    Takeda T; Fujiwara H; Suga M
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Nov; 16(11):1947-1956. PubMed ID: 34694572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: A study of feasibility and reproducibility using an ergonomic pillow-like passive driver.
    Huang X; Chafi H; Matthews KL; Carmichael O; Li T; Miao Q; Wang S; Jia G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 59():68-76. PubMed ID: 30858002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A regularization-free elasticity reconstruction method for ultrasound elastography with freehand scan.
    Pan X; Liu K; Bai J; Luo J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Sep; 13():132. PubMed ID: 25194553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous magnetic resonance and optical elastography acquisitions: Comparison of displacement images and shear modulus estimations using a single vibration source.
    Brinker ST; Kearney SP; Royston TJ; Klatt D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():135-144. PubMed ID: 29775815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Travelling wave expansion: a model fitting approach to the inverse problem of elasticity reconstruction.
    Baghani A; Salcudean S; Honarvar M; Sahebjavaher RS; Rohling R; Sinkus R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1555-65. PubMed ID: 21813354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance poroelastography: an algorithm for estimating the mechanical properties of fluid-saturated soft tissues.
    Perriñez PR; Kennedy FE; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):746-55. PubMed ID: 20199912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
    Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography.
    Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Bercoff J; Tanter M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2032-5. PubMed ID: 21989866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative shear wave magnetic resonance elastography: comparison to a dynamic shear material test.
    Ringleb SI; Chen Q; Lake DS; Manduca A; Ehman RL; An KN
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 May; 53(5):1197-201. PubMed ID: 15844144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the soft tissue ultrasound elastography using FEM based inversion approach.
    Eshaghinia SS; Taghvaeipour A; Aghdam MM; Rivaz H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Mar; 238(3):271-287. PubMed ID: 38240143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MREJ: MRE elasticity reconstruction on ImageJ.
    Xiang K; Zhu XL; Wang CX; Li BN
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Aug; 43(7):847-52. PubMed ID: 23746726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of in-vivo local shear modulus by combining multiple phase offsets mr elastography.
    Suga M; Matsuda T; Minato K; Oshiro O; Chihara K; Okamoto J; Takizawa O; Komori M; Takahashi T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):933-7. PubMed ID: 11604870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography.
    Papazoglou S; Hamhaber U; Braun J; Sack I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3147-58. PubMed ID: 18495979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does group velocity always reflect elastic modulus in shear wave elastography?
    Pelivanov I; Gao L; Pitre J; Kirby M; Song S; Li D; Shen T; Wang R; O'Donnell M
    J Biomed Opt; 2019 Jul; 24(7):1-11. PubMed ID: 31342691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.