81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19784540)
21. Appropriate utilization of transesophageal echocardiography.
Rao GA; Sajnani NV; Kusnetzky LL; Main ML
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 103(5):727-9. PubMed ID: 19231342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The appropriateness of chiropractic spinal manipulation for low back pain: a pilot study.
Shekelle PG; Hurwitz EL; Coulter I; Adams AH; Genovese B; Brook RH
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 7673792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique.
Abu Hilal M; Pearce NW
Dig Surg; 2008; 25(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 18784413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Laparoscopic surgery of the liver: state of the art].
Croce E; Olmi S; Magnone S; Erba L; Bertolini A
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(6):765-76. PubMed ID: 14725215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Developing Appropriateness Criteria for Pediatric Vascular Access.
Ullman AJ; Chopra V; Brown E; Kleidon T; Cooke M; Rickard CM; Bernstein SJ
Pediatrics; 2020 Jun; 145(Suppl 3):S233-S242. PubMed ID: 32482737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utility of RAND/UCLA appropriateness method in validating multiple-choice questions on ECG.
Kaga T; Inaba S; Shikano Y; Watanabe Y; Fujisawa T; Akazawa Y; Ohshita M; Kawakami H; Higashi H; Aono J; Nagai T; Islam MZ; Wannous M; Sakata M; Yamamoto K; Furukawa TA; Yamaguchi O
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):448. PubMed ID: 38658906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.
Quintana JM; Cabriada J; de Tejada I; Varona M; Oribe V; Barrios B; Aróstegui I; Bilbao A
Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Dec; 11(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 12468691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography.
Carbonaro S; Villines TC; Hausleiter J; Devine PJ; Gerber TC; Taylor AJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 19577209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of an online tool to determine appropriateness for an epilepsy surgery evaluation.
Jette N; Quan H; Tellez-Zenteno JF; Macrodimitris S; Hader WJ; Sherman EM; Hamiwka LD; Wirrell EC; Burneo JG; Metcalfe A; Faris PD; Hernandez-Ronquillo L; Kwon CS; Kirk A; Wiebe S;
Neurology; 2012 Sep; 79(11):1084-93. PubMed ID: 22895589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Swan Ganz catheter. Experts opinion].
Cohen Arazi H; Nani S; Giorgi M; Guardiani F; Caturla N; Benzadón M;
Medicina (B Aires); 2014; 74(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 25188663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of appropriateness ratings for cataract surgery between convened and mail-only multidisciplinary panels.
Tobacman JK; Scott IU; Cyphert ST; Zimmerman MB
Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11760106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Candidate Quality Measures for Hand Surgery.
Hand Surgery Quality Consortium
J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Nov; 42(11):859-866.e3. PubMed ID: 28818350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of panel-based guidelines for colonoscopy: an international comparison.
Burnand B; Vader JP; Froehlich F; Dupriez K; Larequi-Lauber T; Pache I; Dubois RW; Brook RH; Gonvers JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Feb; 47(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 9512282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Swiss consensus guidelines for hysterectomy. Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Switzerland.
Schilling J; Wyss P; Faisst K; Gutzwiller F; Haller U
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1999 Mar; 64(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 10366053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Guidelines for Management of Urgent Symptoms in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma and Biliary Stents or Catheters using the Modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Process.
Iyer RV; Acquisto SG; Bridgewater JA; Choti MA; Hong TS; Kis B; Mead PA; Parikh ND; Roberts LR; Roberts R; Salem R; Sicklick JK; Siegel RS; Whisenant JR; Cherepanov D; Broder MS; Valle JW
Cancers (Basel); 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32825784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of prescribing appropriateness criteria for older Australians using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.
Basger BJ; Chen TF; Moles RJ
BMJ Open; 2012; 2(5):. PubMed ID: 22983875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method.
Ostovar R; Rashidian A; Pourreza A; Rashidi BH; Hantooshzadeh S; Ardebili HE; Mahmoudi M;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Sep; 10():52. PubMed ID: 20840776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Concordance of physician ratings with the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization.
Chan PS; Brindis RG; Cohen DJ; Jones PG; Gialde E; Bach RG; Curtis J; Bethea CF; Shelton ME; Spertus JA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Apr; 57(14):1546-53. PubMed ID: 21453833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Appropriateness use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography: relationship with radiology benefit managers preauthorization determination and comparison of the new (2010) criteria to the original (2007) criteria.
Willens HJ; Hendel RC; Inhaber FR; Chakko SC; Postel C; Hasan T; Mohammed F
Am Heart J; 2011 Oct; 162(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 21982672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of explicit criteria for total knee replacement.
Escobar A; Quintana JM; Aróstegui I; Azkárate J; Güenaga JI; Arenaza JC; Garai I
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 12701939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
