These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19785853)

  • 21. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
    Finger WR
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Complications of use of intrauterine devices among HIV-1-infected women.
    Sinei SK; Morrison CS; Sekadde-Kigondu C; Allen M; Kokonya D
    Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9111):1238-41. PubMed ID: 9643743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Value of intrauterine contraception].
    Neumann HG
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1985; 79(10):449-51. PubMed ID: 4049935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intrauterine devices and adolescents.
    Gold MA; Johnson LM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 20(5):464-9. PubMed ID: 18797269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pelvic inflammatory disease among women using copper IUDs, Progestasert, oral contraceptive pills or vaginal contraceptive pills: a 4-year prospective investigation.
    Larsson B; Rodau S; Patek E
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jul; 2(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 12278910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic and therapeutic technology assessment. Intrauterine devices.
    JAMA; 1989 Apr; 261(14):2127-30. PubMed ID: 2926948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device: 5-year evaluation.
    Sellors JW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 7326653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An overview of IUD research and implications for the future.
    Zipper J; Edelman DA; Goldsmith A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1977; 15(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 562787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
    Finger WR; Barr D
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A review of the association between intrauterine devices and acute pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Ory HW
    J Reprod Med; 1978 Apr; 20(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 353272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Postplacental intrauterine device insertion at a teaching hospital.
    Jatlaoui TC; Marcus M; Jamieson DJ; Goedken P; Cwiak C
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 24565735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. IUDs: current perspectives.
    Hepburn S
    Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrauterine contraception: incidence and factors associated with uterine perforation--a population-based study.
    Kaislasuo J; Suhonen S; Gissler M; Lähteenmäki P; Heikinheimo O
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2658-63. PubMed ID: 22763376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intrauterine devices.
    Bilian X
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Apr; 16(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 12041959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Lee NC; Rubin GL; Ory HW; Burkman RT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 6856209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
    Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
    Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Best practices to minimize risk of infection with intrauterine device insertion.
    Caddy S; Yudin MH; Hakim J; Money DM; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Mar; 36(3):266-274. PubMed ID: 24612897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preventing infection related to insertion of an intrauterine device.
    Jovanovic R; Barone CM; Van Natta FC; Congema E
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 3367334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.
    Elhag KM; Bahar AM; Mubarak AA
    J Med Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 25(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 3357191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.