BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19785946)

  • 1. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Slater M; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Nov; 91(8):670-2. PubMed ID: 19785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Demoulin L; Kesteloot K; Penninckx F
    Surg Endosc; 1996 May; 10(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 8658331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children.
    Ure BM; Lefering R; Holschneider AM
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1999 Feb; 9(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 10207696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis of minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric setting.
    Mahomed AA; McLean V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Jun; 17(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 17570792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Swem T; Fazzalari R
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Pontarelli EM; Grinberg GG; Isaacs RS; Morris JP; Ajayi O; Yenumula PR
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 30488194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study.
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt CN; Encke A
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):147-50. PubMed ID: 7552133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surgery.
    Cuschieri A
    Health Econ; 1993 Dec; 2(4):367-9. PubMed ID: 8142999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Costs and benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: abdominal wall lifting vs. pneumoperitoneum procedure.
    Ishikawa M; Nakagawa T; Nishioka M; Ogata S; Miyauchi T; Kashiwagi Y; Uemura N; Inoue S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(70):497-500. PubMed ID: 16995448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.
    Allen JW; Polk HC
    Am Surg; 2002 May; 68(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Traverso LW; Hargrave K
    Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 7747829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revising a laparoscopic appendicectomy set to reduce reliance on disposable surgical instruments: supporting the transition to sustainable surgical practice.
    Labib PL; Ford B; Winfield M; Douie WJ; Kanwar A; Sanders G
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Feb; 106(2):167-172. PubMed ID: 37051744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.