131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19786321)
1. Modeling mercury speciation in combustion flue gases using support vector machine: prediction and evaluation.
Zhao B; Zhang Z; Jin J; Pan WP
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Feb; 174(1-3):244-50. PubMed ID: 19786321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A robust framework to predict mercury speciation in combustion flue gases.
Ticknor JL; Hsu-Kim H; Deshusses MA
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jan; 264():380-5. PubMed ID: 24316249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China.
Tang S; Feng X; Qiu J; Yin G; Yang Z
Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 17517388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mercury emissions from selected stationary combustion sources in Korea.
Jun Lee S; Seo YC; Jurng J; Hong JH; Park JW; Hyun JE; Gyu Lee T
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 325(1-3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15144786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive evaluation of the influence of air combustion and oxy-fuel combustion flue gas constituents on Hg(0) re-emission in WFGD systems.
Ochoa-González R; Díaz-Somoano M; Martínez-Tarazona MR
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 276():157-63. PubMed ID: 24887118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A three-stage system to remove mercury and dioxins in flue gases.
Hylander LD; Sollenberg H; Westas H
Sci Total Environ; 2003 Mar; 304(1-3):137-44. PubMed ID: 12663178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CeO2-TiO2 catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas.
Li H; Wu CY; Li Y; Zhang J
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7394-400. PubMed ID: 21770402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxidation and stabilization of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas by sulfur monobromide.
Qu Z; Yan N; Liu P; Guo Y; Jia J
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):3889-94. PubMed ID: 20408537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of mercury capture by sorbent injection using a simplified model.
Zhao B; Zhang Z; Jin J; Pan WP
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(2-3):1179-85. PubMed ID: 19541417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory investigation of Hg release from flue gas desulfurization products.
Gustin M; Ladwig K
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(10):4012-8. PubMed ID: 20420364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A theoretical study of properties and reactions involving arsenic and selenium compounds present in coal combustion flue gases.
Urban DR; Wilcox J
J Phys Chem A; 2006 May; 110(17):5847-52. PubMed ID: 16640380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel QSAR model for prediction of apoptosis-inducing activity of 4-aryl-4-H-chromenes based on support vector machine.
Fatemi MH; Gharaghani S
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7746-54. PubMed ID: 17870538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of iodine on the removal of elemental mercury from the simulated coal-fired flue gas.
Chi Y; Yan N; Qu Z; Qiao S; Jia J
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):776-81. PubMed ID: 19153004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of freeboard extension on co-combustion of coal and olive cake in a fluidized bed combustor.
Akpulat O; Varol M; Atimtay AT
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Aug; 101(15):6177-84. PubMed ID: 20347293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas.
Granite EJ; Freeman MC; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Pennline HW
J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 16959396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speciation and mass-balance of mercury from pulverized coal fired power plants burning western Canadian subbituminous coals.
Goodarzi F
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 15480492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas.
Yan R; Liang DT; Tay JH
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2003; 10(6):399-407. PubMed ID: 14690030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulation of the flue gas cleaning system of an RDF incineration power plant.
Jannelli E; Minutillo M
Waste Manag; 2007; 27(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 16750619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential assessment of the "support vector machine" method in forecasting ambient air pollutant trends.
Lu WZ; Wang WJ
Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(5):693-701. PubMed ID: 15792667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
