These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1050 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19787169)

  • 1. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Caveats in the proficient preparation of an APA-style research manuscript for publication.
    Cash TF
    Body Image; 2009 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19059816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Honesty and good faith: two cornerstones in the ethics of biomedical publications].
    Reyes H
    Rev Med Chil; 2007 Apr; 135(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 17554448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Author and authorship in medical journals].
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2009; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19214815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing.
    Lipworth WL; Kerridge IH; Carter SM; Little M
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Apr; 72(7):1056-63. PubMed ID: 21388730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publishing in English-language journals.
    Davis AJ; Tschudin V
    Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does online submission of manuscripts improve efficiency?
    Govender P; Buckley O; McAuley G; O'Brien J; Torreggiani WC
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):231-4. PubMed ID: 19202995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
    Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ethics in articles published in medical journals].
    Reyes H; Palma J; Andresen M
    Rev Med Chil; 2007 Apr; 135(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 17554464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of the manuscript reviewer.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research papers submitted to Australian Family Physician - types and timelines.
    Green R; Del Mar C
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 May; 35(5):362-4. PubMed ID: 16680221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.