These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19787847)

  • 1. Time preference bias in time trade-off.
    van der Pol M; Roux L
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Jun; 6(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 19787847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lead time TTO: leading to better health state valuations?
    Attema AE; Versteegh MM; Oppe M; Brouwer WB; Stolk EA
    Health Econ; 2013 Apr; 22(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 22396243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constantly proving the opposite? A test of CPTO using a broad time horizon and correcting for discounting.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    Qual Life Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 21505879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic.
    Dolan P; Stalmeier P
    J Health Econ; 2003 May; 22(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 12683961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the (not so) constant proportional trade-off in TTO.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    Qual Life Res; 2010 May; 19(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 20151207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health State Values Derived from People with Multiple Sclerosis for a Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measure: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-Eight Dimensions-Patient Version (MSIS-8D-P).
    Goodwin E; Green C; Hawton A
    Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 30442282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?
    Oldridge N; Furlong W; Perkins A; Feeny D; Torrance GW
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 15(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 18800005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deriving time discounting correction factors for TTO tariffs.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 23(4):410-25. PubMed ID: 23564665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of correcting values: influence and importance of correcting TTO scores for time preference.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):879-84. PubMed ID: 20659269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states.
    Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA
    Value Health; 2012; 15(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22867789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relative sensitivity of willingness-to-pay and time-trade-off to changes in health status: an empirical investigation.
    Smith RD
    Health Econ; 2001 Sep; 10(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 11550290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An overview of the time trade-off method: concept, foundation, and the evaluation of distorting factors in putting a value on health.
    Lugnér AK; Krabbe PFM
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2020 Aug; 20(4):331-342. PubMed ID: 32552002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferences for improvements in attributes associated with basal insulin: a time trade-off and willingness-to-pay survey of a diabetic and non-diabetic population in Sweden.
    Olofsson S; Norrlid H; Persson U
    J Med Econ; 2016 Oct; 19(10):945-58. PubMed ID: 27149402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population.
    Greiner W; Claes C; Busschbach JJ; von der Schulenburg JM
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Jun; 6(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 19787848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder.
    Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influenced from the start: anchoring bias in time trade-off valuations.
    Augestad LA; Stavem K; Kristiansen IS; Samuelsen CH; Rand-Hendriksen K
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2179-91. PubMed ID: 27016943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.
    Shah K; Mulhern B; Longworth L; Janssen MF
    Value Health; 2016 Jan; 19(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 26797236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A (Latent) Class of Their Own: Response Patterns in Trading Off Quantity and Quality of Life in Time Trade-Off Exercises.
    van Nooten FE; Houghton K; van Exel J; van Agthoven M; Brouwer WBF; Stull DE
    Value Health; 2017 Dec; 20(10):1403-1410. PubMed ID: 29241900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores.
    Martin AJ; Glasziou PP; Simes RJ; Lumley T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 10815360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Derive Health State Utilities from Ordinal Preference Data.
    Reddy BP; Adams R; Walsh C; Barry M; Kind P
    Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 26409612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.