These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19788009)

  • 1. ECHR 2009/13 Case of K.H. and others v. Slovakia, 28 April 2009, no. 32881/04 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2009 Sep; 16(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 19788009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/5. Case of V.C .v. Slovakia, 8 November 2011, no. 18968/07 (former Section IV).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 22558660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2008/14 Case of I v. Finland, 17 July 2008, no. 20511/03 (Fourth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2008 Dec; 15(4):426-9. PubMed ID: 19180982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. European court of human rights. ECHR 2014/16. Case of L.H. v. Latvia, 29 April 2014, no. 52019/07 (fourth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Sep; 21(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 25199403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roma women reveal that forced sterilisation remains.
    Holt E
    Lancet; 2005 Mar 12-18; 365(9463):927-8. PubMed ID: 15773002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ECHR 2009/16 case of Dvorácek and Dvorácková v. Slovakia, 28 July 2009, no. 30754/04 (fourth section).
    Dute J;
    Eur J Health Law; 2009 Dec; 16(4):372-5. PubMed ID: 19927426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ECHR 2004/3 case of Tkacik v. Slovakia, 14 October 2003, no. 42472/98 (fourth section).
    Eur J Health Law; 2004 Mar; 11(1):115-7. PubMed ID: 15285204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sterilisation and the birth of a right: effective access to medical records.
    Eijkholt M
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 20144967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell.
    Berry RM
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary sterilization among HIV-positive Garifuna women from Honduras seeking asylum in the United States: Two case reports.
    Atkinson HG; Ottenheimer D
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 May; 56():94-98. PubMed ID: 29635207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Report says 100 Roma women have been forcibly sterilised in Slovakia.
    Krosnar K
    BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7384):302. PubMed ID: 12574035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involuntary sterilization of mentally retarded minors in Nebraska.
    Small MA
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1):410-29. PubMed ID: 16041875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estate of C.W.: a pragmatic approach to the involuntary sterilization of the mentally disabled.
    Adler RR
    Nova Law J; 1996; 20(3):1323-68. PubMed ID: 12173631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of Saskatchewan law on the sterilization of persons with mental disabilities.
    Newman D
    Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(1):329-46. PubMed ID: 12680362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The legal situation concerning the sterilization of mentally handicapped persons].
    Braun M; Miess D; Sibinger J; Engelmann U
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Jun; 128(25-26):1412-4. PubMed ID: 12813677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In re Romero: sterilization and competency.
    Marcus J
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 16144140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent developments in health law. Compensating victims of forced sterilization.
    Klein JM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(2):422-6. PubMed ID: 22966504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roma women were unlawfully sterilised.
    Krosnar K
    BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7534):138. PubMed ID: 16424478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The introduction of reversible sterilization.
    Cook R; Dickens B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Oct; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 17673237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gypsy women launch claim following sterilisation.
    Kosner K
    BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7486):275. PubMed ID: 15695265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.