These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19788638)

  • 1. A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.
    Ye M; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Pohll GM; Reeves DM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 19788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating Groundwater Interbasin Flow Using Multiple Models and Multiple Types of Data.
    Ye M; Wang L; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB
    Ground Water; 2016 Nov; 54(6):805-817. PubMed ID: 27101525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model averaging techniques for quantifying conceptual model uncertainty.
    Singh A; Mishra S; Ruskauff G
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 19878329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models.
    Højberg AL; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 16304950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using atmospheric tracers to reduce uncertainty in groundwater recharge areas.
    Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC; Robbins GA
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):858-68. PubMed ID: 21416662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
    Li H; Zhang K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The combined use of MODFLOW and precipitation-runoff modeling to simulate groundwater flow in a diffuse-pollution prone watershed.
    Elçi A; Karadaş D; Fistikoğlu O
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 20595769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Groundwater recharge at five representative sites in the Hebei Plain, China.
    Lu X; Jin M; van Genuchten MT; Wang B
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 20100294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scale effects of hydrostratigraphy and recharge zonation on base flow.
    Juckem PF; Hunt RJ; Anderson MP
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 16681517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical modeling of saline water transport in the lower Nam Kam Basin, Amphoe That Phanom, Changwat Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.
    Srisuk K; Sriboonlue V; Buaphan C; Archvichai L; Youngme W; Satarak P; Jaruchaikul S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):157-64. PubMed ID: 11724482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical postcalibration uncertainty analysis: Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
    James SC; Doherty JE; Eddebbarh AA
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):851-69. PubMed ID: 19744249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan.
    Babiker IS; Mohamed MA; Hiyama T; Kato K
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jun; 345(1-3):127-40. PubMed ID: 15919534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A hierarchical Bayesian model averaging framework for groundwater prediction under uncertainty.
    Chitsazan N; Tsai FT
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(2):305-16. PubMed ID: 24890644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Groundwater modeling in integrated water resources management--visions for 2020.
    Refsgaard JC; Højberg AL; Møller I; Hansen M; Søndergaard V
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):633-48. PubMed ID: 19788560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian inference of coupled groundwater flow and radiogenic helium-4 production and transport at the catchment scale.
    Casillas-Trasvina A; Rogiers B; Beerten K; Wouters L; Walraevens K
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Dec; 954():176510. PubMed ID: 39362538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inverse modeling of BTEX dissolution and biodegradation at the Bemidji, MN crude-oil spill site.
    Essaid HI; Cozzarelli IM; Eganhouse RP; Herkelrath WN; Bekins BA; Delin GN
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Dec; 67(1-4):269-99. PubMed ID: 14607480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of numerical solutions of partial differential equations with probabilistic and possibilistic parameters for the quantification of uncertainty in subsurface solute transport.
    Zhang K; Achari G; Li H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Nov; 110(1-2):45-59. PubMed ID: 19796843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Programs for calibration-based Monte Carlo simulation of recharge areas.
    Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):472-6. PubMed ID: 21967487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.