These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19788665)
1. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Poostchi A; Mitchell R; Nicholas S; Purdie G; Wells A Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 37(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19788665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects. Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes. Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry. Muttuvelu DV; Baggesen K; Ehlers N Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 90(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 20840218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus. Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers. Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Avitabile T; Longo A; Rocca D; Amato R; Gagliano C; Castaing M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 248(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 19727794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness. Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure. Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]