These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19788954)

  • 1. Sequential design with boundaries approach in pediatric intervention research reduces sample size.
    van der Lee JH; Wesseling J; Tanck MW; Offringa M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 19788954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient ways exist to obtain the optimal sample size in clinical trials in rare diseases.
    van der Lee JH; Wesseling J; Tanck MW; Offringa M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 18313556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Power and Sample Size Calculation in Rehabilitation Trial Reports: A Methodological Assessment.
    Castellini G; Gianola S; Bonovas S; Moja L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1195-201. PubMed ID: 26971671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential designs with small samples: Evaluation and recommendations for normal responses.
    Nikolakopoulos S; Roes KC; van der Tweel I
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1115-1127. PubMed ID: 27342574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Chinese pediatrics journals improve after the CONSORT Statement is adopted?
    Ma B; Ke FY; Chen ZM; Qi GQ; Li HM; Liu WJ; Zhang Y; Hu Q; Yang KH
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):889-94. PubMed ID: 22765929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of the reported sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed.
    Lee PH; Tse ACY
    Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():16-21. PubMed ID: 27769569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Jakobsen JC; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information-based sample size re-estimation in group sequential design for longitudinal trials.
    Zhou J; Adewale A; Shentu Y; Liu J; Anderson K
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3801-14. PubMed ID: 24797715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rationale for placebo-controlled trials: methodology and policy considerations.
    Miller FG
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):49-50. PubMed ID: 19998193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of the quality of clinical therapeutic research published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics].
    Wang YL; Chen Y; Wang Y; Wang SM
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 23527928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Group sequential design for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Mazumdar M; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):727-39. PubMed ID: 12587102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-stage drop-the-losers design for multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wason J; Stallard N; Bowden J; Jennison C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):508-524. PubMed ID: 25228636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control theory: placebo-controlled drug trials have problems. Active-controlled drug trials are not always the solution.
    Golomb BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):67-9. PubMed ID: 19998203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential analysis in neonatal research-systematic review.
    Lava SAG; Elie V; Ha PTV; Jacqz-Aigrain E
    Eur J Pediatr; 2018 May; 177(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 29453599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Keitz SA; Peterson BL; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5. PubMed ID: 17296417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement.
    Huang YQ; Traore K; Ibrahim B; Sewitch MJ; Nguyen LHP
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 May; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 29764496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological reporting of randomized clinical trials in respiratory research in 2010.
    Lu Y; Yao Q; Gu J; Shen C
    Respir Care; 2013 Sep; 58(9):1546-51. PubMed ID: 23307824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric surgery: could we do better?
    Curry JI; Reeves B; Stringer MD
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Apr; 38(4):556-9. PubMed ID: 12677565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of interventions and "standard of care" control arms in pediatric clinical trials: a quantitative analysis.
    Yu AM; Balasubramanaiam B; Offringa M; Kelly LE
    Pediatr Res; 2018 Sep; 84(3):393-398. PubMed ID: 29899384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.