136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19793949)
1. On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2009 Oct; 35(10):651-2. PubMed ID: 19793949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: Strong's counterexamples fail.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2009 May; 35(5):304-5; discussion 326-7. PubMed ID: 19407035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critique of "the best secular argument against abortion".
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 18827103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Boonin on the future-like-ours argument against abortion.
Galvão P
Bioethics; 2007 Jul; 21(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 17845456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "future like ours" argument and human embryonic stem cell research.
Kuflik A
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 18511611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the 'future like ours' argument.
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):567-9. PubMed ID: 22505733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A future like ours revisited.
Brown MT
J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):192-5; discussion 202. PubMed ID: 12042408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
Reitan E
Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument.
Brill S
Bioethics; 2019 Feb; 33(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 30480832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two puzzles for Marquis's conservative view on abortion.
Card RF
Bioethics; 2006 Sep; 20(5):264-77. PubMed ID: 17100010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The deprivation argument against abortion.
Stretton D
Bioethics; 2004 Apr; 18(2):144-80. PubMed ID: 15148946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The parenthood argument.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence.
Bobier C
J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Sep; 20(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 37278912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism.
Sauchelli A
Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 29369389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strong's objections to the future of value account.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 21335573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Derivative deprivation and the wrong of abortion.
Stratton-Lake P
Bioethics; 2021 Mar; 35(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 33368424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument succeed?
Blackshaw BP
Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):203-206. PubMed ID: 31769884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does a normal foetus really have a future of value? A reply to Marquis.
Lovering RP
Bioethics; 2005 Apr; 19(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 15943022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parthenogenesis, identity, and value.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2024 Jun; 38(5):419-424. PubMed ID: 38652592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the Epicurean challenge.
Ekendahl K
J Med Ethics; 2020 Apr; 46(4):273-274. PubMed ID: 31630130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
