136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19793949)
21. Murder, abortion, contraception, greenhouse gas emissions and the deprivation of non-discernible and non-existent people: a reply to Marquis and Christensen.
McLachlan HV
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 45(6):415-416. PubMed ID: 31018995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can the Future-Like-Ours Argument Survive Ontological Scrutiny?
Adams M; Rimell N
J Med Philos; 2022 Nov; 47(5):667-680. PubMed ID: 34655219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three Problems with the Impairment Argument.
Simkulet W
Asian Bioeth Rev; 2023 Apr; 15(2):169-179. PubMed ID: 37035483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The pro-life argument from substantial identity and the pro-choice argument from asymmetric value: a reply to Patrick Lee.
Reiman J
Bioethics; 2007 Jul; 21(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 17845457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Future-like-ours as a metaphysical reductio ad absurdum argument of personal identity.
Chaffer TJ
Bioethics; 2023 May; 37(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 36773306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Taking precautionary concerns seriously: a defense of a misused anti-abortion argument.
Friberg-Fernros H
J Med Philos; 2014 Jun; 39(3):228-47. PubMed ID: 24793317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Broadening the future of value account of the wrongness of killing.
Di Nucci E
Med Health Care Philos; 2015 Nov; 18(4):587-90. PubMed ID: 25608793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion.
Coleman MC
J Med Ethics; 2013 Feb; 39(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 23038800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion and the argument from potential: what we owe to the ones who might exist.
Giubilini A
J Med Philos; 2012 Feb; 37(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 22241864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prudent warnings and imprudent reactions: "judicial usurpation" and the unraveling of rights.
Arkes H
Hum Life Rev; 2002; 28(4):7-38. PubMed ID: 12751489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jul; 45(7):478-479. PubMed ID: 30772840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fine-tuning the impairment argument.
Blackshaw BP; Hendricks P
J Med Ethics; 2021 Sep; 47(9):641-642. PubMed ID: 33172908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion: identity and loss.
Quinn W
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(1):24-54. PubMed ID: 11651752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rehabilitating human nature.
Andreou C
Bioethics; 2010 Nov; 24(9):461-9. PubMed ID: 19508308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.
Christensen A
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 45(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 30429204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Continuing conversations about abortion and deprivation.
Christensen A
J Med Ethics; 2020 Apr; 46(4):275-276. PubMed ID: 31836622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to 'Abortion and Deprivation'.
Colgrove N
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 45(6):380-383. PubMed ID: 31189723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. It's a wonderful life: is it possible to say that a severely disabled child has been harmed by the mere fact of being born?
Perry R
Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Nov; 93(2):329-400. PubMed ID: 18354869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
