These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19794833)

  • 1. Aggression as positive reinforcement in mice under various ratio- and time-based reinforcement schedules.
    May ME; Kennedy CH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 19794833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.
    McClure GY; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1368-80. PubMed ID: 9190873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aggressive behavior as a reinforcer in mice: activation by allopregnanolone.
    Fish EW; De Bold JF; Miczek KA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12373446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):314-24. PubMed ID: 24740374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cooperative responding in rats: II. Performance on fixed-ratio schedules of mutual reinforcement.
    de Carvalho LC; Dos Santos L; Regaço A; Couto KC; de Souza DDG; Todorov JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Nov; 114(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 33006162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal regulation of children with autism spectrum disorder exposed to a differential-reinforcement-of low-rates schedule.
    Gaucher M; Forget J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):515-529. PubMed ID: 32201952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.
    Fowler SC; Pinkston J; Vorontsova E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Jun; 204(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 19142629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EFFECTS OF A DRL CONTINGENCY ADDED TO A FIXED-INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE.
    FARMER J; SCHOENFELD WN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Nov; 7(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 14238904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some determinants of remote behavioral history effects in humans.
    Hirai M; Okouchi H; Matsumoto A; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Nov; 96(3):387-415. PubMed ID: 22084497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.
    Rickard JF; Body S; Zhang Z; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Jan; 91(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 19230513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delayed reinforcement hinders subsequent extinction.
    Shibata Y; Yoshimoto A; Yamashiro K; Ikegaya Y; Matsumoto N
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2022 Feb; 591():20-25. PubMed ID: 34995981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alterations in DRH and DRL performance in rats developmentally exposed to an environmental PCB mixture.
    Sable HJ; Powers BE; Wang VC; Widholm JJ; Schantz SL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2006; 28(5):548-56. PubMed ID: 16930942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interresponse time changes as a function of water deprivation and amphetamine.
    Brown BM; Seiden LS
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 May; 193(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 1142113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thermal stress modulates temporal patterns of responding on a multiple DRL-FR schedule.
    Thomas JR; Ahlers ST; Shurtleff D
    Physiol Behav; 1991 Aug; 50(2):437-42. PubMed ID: 1745691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the molecular structure of behavior: separate effects of caffeine, cocaine, and adenosine agonists on interresponse times and lever-press durations.
    Newland MC
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 9832996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pigeon responding in fixed-interval and response-initiated fixed-interval schedules.
    Fox AE; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 23897546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acquisition of responding with a remifentanil-associated conditioned reinforcer in the rat.
    Bertz JW; Woods JH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Sep; 229(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 23609770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction of reinforcement history with methadone on responding maintained under a fixed-interval schedule.
    Nader MA; Thompson T
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Mar; 32(3):643-9. PubMed ID: 2740420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.