414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19795450)
1. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.
Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens.
Shaffer LG; Coppinger J; Alliman S; Torchia BA; Theisen A; Ballif BC; Bejjani BA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Sep; 28(9):789-95. PubMed ID: 18646242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microarray-based prenatal diagnosis for the identification of fetal chromosome abnormalities.
Shaffer LG; Rosenfeld JA
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2013 Jul; 13(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 23895129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Fetal chromosome technique by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization].
Jonveaux P
Arch Pediatr; 2010 Jul; 17(7):1119-23. PubMed ID: 20347579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal microarray analysis as second-tier diagnostic test: single-center prospective study.
Schmid M; Stary S; Springer S; Bettelheim D; Husslein P; Streubel B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 23292918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Copy number variations associated with idiopathic autism identified by whole-genome microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Cho SC; Yim SH; Yoo HK; Kim MY; Jung GY; Shin GW; Kim BN; Hwang JW; Kang JJ; Kim TM; Chung YJ
Psychiatr Genet; 2009 Aug; 19(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 19407672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.
Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization].
Zhang WS; Chen QN; Wu XH; Liang QH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19350506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic microarrays: a technology overview.
Brady PD; Vermeesch JR
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 22467164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis.
Mademont-Soler I; Morales C; Soler A; Martínez-Crespo JM; Shen Y; Margarit E; Clusellas N; Obón M; Wu BL; Sánchez A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 23233332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.
Scott F; Murphy K; Carey L; Greville W; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Robertson R; McLennan A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 23401365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform.
Aston E; Whitby H; Maxwell T; Glaus N; Cowley B; Lowry D; Zhu XL; Issa B; South ST; Brothman AR
J Med Genet; 2008 May; 45(5):268-74. PubMed ID: 18178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011.
Novelli A; Grati FR; Ballarati L; Bernardini L; Bizzoco D; Camurri L; Casalone R; Cardarelli L; Cavalli P; Ciccone R; Clementi M; Dalprà L; Gentile M; Gelli G; Grammatico P; Malacarne M; Nardone AM; Pecile V; Simoni G; Zuffardi O; Giardino D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 39(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22262341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.
Wright D; Carey L; Battersby S; Nguyen T; Clarke M; Nash B; Gulesserian E; Cross J; Darmanian A
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2016 Dec; 20(12):791-798. PubMed ID: 27690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization by two-stage screening for 536 patients with mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies.
Hayashi S; Imoto I; Aizu Y; Okamoto N; Mizuno S; Kurosawa K; Okamoto N; Honda S; Araki S; Mizutani S; Numabe H; Saitoh S; Kosho T; Fukushima Y; Mitsubuchi H; Endo F; Chinen Y; Kosaki R; Okuyama T; Ohki H; Yoshihashi H; Ono M; Takada F; Ono H; Yagi M; Matsumoto H; Makita Y; Hata A; Inazawa J
J Hum Genet; 2011 Feb; 56(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 20981036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of submicroscopic constitutional chromosome aberrations in clinical diagnostics: a validation of the practical performance of different array platforms.
Zhang ZF; Ruivenkamp C; Staaf J; Zhu H; Barbaro M; Petillo D; Khoo SK; Borg A; Fan YS; Schoumans J
Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 16(7):786-92. PubMed ID: 18285835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
