These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19795782)

  • 1. [Can the local energy minimization refine the PDB structures of different resolution universally?].
    Godzi MG; Gromova AP; Oferkin IV; Mironov PV
    Biofizika; 2009; 54(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 19795782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.
    Butterfoss GL; Richardson JS; Hermans J
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Jan; 61(Pt 1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15608380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Necessary conditions for avoiding incorrect polypeptide folds in conformational search by energy minimization.
    Vajda S; Jafri MS; Sezerman OU; DeLisi C
    Biopolymers; 1993 Jan; 33(1):173-92. PubMed ID: 8427934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of protein loop conformations using multiscale modeling methods with physical energy scoring functions.
    Olson MA; Feig M; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):820-31. PubMed ID: 17876760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing.
    Andrec M; Snyder DA; Zhou Z; Young J; Montelione GT; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 17623851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy.
    Melo F; Feytmans E
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Apr; 277(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 9571028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
    Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures.
    Lee SY; Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2006 May; 63(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 16456861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refinement of protein crystal structures using energy restraints derived from linear-scaling quantum mechanics.
    Yu N; Yennawar HP; Merz KM
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Mar; 61(Pt 3):322-32. PubMed ID: 15735343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The limit of accuracy of protein modeling: influence of crystal packing on protein structure.
    Eyal E; Gerzon S; Potapov V; Edelman M; Sobolev V
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Aug; 351(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16005885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
    Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated and accurate deposition of structures solved by X-ray diffraction to the Protein Data Bank.
    Yang H; Guranovic V; Dutta S; Feng Z; Berman HM; Westbrook JD
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2004 Oct; 60(Pt 10):1833-9. PubMed ID: 15388930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes.
    Schüttelkopf AW; van Aalten DM
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2004 Aug; 60(Pt 8):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15272157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures: is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X-ray- and NMR-resolved protein structures?
    Garbuzynskiy SO; Melnik BS; Lobanov MY; Finkelstein AV; Galzitskaya OV
    Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 15856480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation.
    Grishaev A; Bax A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(23):7281-92. PubMed ID: 15186165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the correlation between the main-chain and side-chain atomic displacement parameters (B values) in high-resolution protein structures.
    Parthasarathy S; Murthy MR
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 1999 Jan; 55(Pt 1):173-80. PubMed ID: 10089408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space.
    Krieger E; Darden T; Nabuurs SB; Finkelstein A; Vriend G
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 15390263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the interrelationship between atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) and coordinates in protein structures.
    Weiss MS
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Dec; 63(Pt 12):1235-42. PubMed ID: 18084071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural refinement of protein segments containing secondary structure elements: Local sampling, knowledge-based potentials, and clustering.
    Zhu J; Xie L; Honig B
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(2):463-79. PubMed ID: 16927337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the conformational space of protein loops using a mean field technique with MOLS sampling.
    Kanagasabai V; Arunachalam J; Prasad PA; Gautham N
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):908-21. PubMed ID: 17357159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.