These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19797094)

  • 1. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples.
    Dresner HS; Hilger PA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
    Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples.
    Fisher DA; Bengero LL; Clapp BC; Burgess M
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M;
    Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
    Bron T; Zakine G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Renal transplant incision closure using new absorbable subcuticular staple device.
    Tellis VA
    Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 17488393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
    Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Running Subcuticular Closure Enables the Most Robust Perfusion After TKA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Wyles CC; Jacobson SR; Houdek MT; Larson DR; Taunton MJ; Sim FH; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 25733009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
    Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Open Liver Resection: A Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Matsuno Y; Yamazaki S; Mitsuka Y; Abe H; Moriguchi M; Higaki T; Takayama T
    World J Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(2):571-580. PubMed ID: 33104835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds.
    Pineros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Rodeheaver G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 23428250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
    Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Feng J; Jiang X; Zhi Z
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251022. PubMed ID: 33945574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial of skin closure by subcuticular suture or skin stapling after elective colorectal cancer surgery.
    Kobayashi S; Ito M; Yamamoto S; Kinugasa Y; Kotake M; Saida Y; Kobatake T; Yamanaka T; Saito N; Moriya Y
    Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 25727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
    Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
    J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PolysorbR (an absorbable lactomer) staples, a safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection.
    Farkas G; Leindler L; Márton J; Lázár G; Farkas G
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(45):17185-9. PubMed ID: 25493034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.