These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19797094)

  • 21. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
    Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
    Feese CA; Johnson S; Jones E; Lambers DS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Superficial Surgical Site Infection in Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery: Subcuticular Suture Versus Skin Staples.
    Tomita K; Chiba N; Ochiai S; Yokozuka K; Gunji T; Hikita K; Ozawa Y; Okihara M; Sano T; Tsutsui R; Shimazu M; Kawachi S
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1385-1393. PubMed ID: 29633116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientific basis for the selection of surgical staples and tissue adhesives for closure of skin wounds.
    Edlich RF; Gubler K; Stevens HS; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Rhoads SK; Long WB
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 21284596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subcuticular sutures reduce surgical site infection after repeat liver resection: a matched cohort analysis.
    Yamazaki S; Takayama T; Matsuno Y; Mitsuka Y; Yoshida N; Moriguchi M; Higaki T
    Biosci Trends; 2021 Jan; 14(6):422-427. PubMed ID: 32999135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective randomized trial of skin adhesive versus sutures for closure of 217 laparoscopic port-site incisions.
    Matin SF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jun; 196(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 12788419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of 2 methods of incision closure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery.
    Xu L; Zhu F; Zhu Z; Liu Z; Sun X; Qiao J; Mao S; Qiu Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):E481-5. PubMed ID: 24480945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An initial evaluation of subcuticular skin closure with absorbable intradermal pins.
    Meinke AK
    Conn Med; 1996 Apr; 60(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 8776122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The absorbable dermal staple device: a faster, more cost-effective method for incisional closure.
    Cross KJ; Teo EH; Wong SL; Lambe JS; Rohde CH; Grant RT; Ascherman JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 19568054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new suture for hair transplantation: poliglecaprone 25.
    Bernstein RM; Rassman WR; Rashid N
    Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jan; 27(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11231232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Value of absorbable stapling in digestive surgery? Experimental study comparing TA metallic stapling, TA absorbable stapling and manual sutures].
    Lehur PA; Gaillard F; Visset J
    J Chir (Paris); 1986 Oct; 123(10):563-9. PubMed ID: 3805171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Staples versus subcuticular closure in cervicotomy incisions.
    Guarino S; Sorrenti S; Greco R; Di Marco C; Nardi M; Filippini A; de Antoni E; Catania A
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 1():S170-2. PubMed ID: 24859405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Closure of skin incision after thyroidectomy through a supraclavicular approach: a comparison between tissue adhesive and staples.
    Yang YL; Xiang YY; Jin LP; Pan YF; Zhou SM; Zhang XH; Qu JM
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 24056141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of absorbable staples for skin closure after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.
    Watson FC; McMullan W; Jordan CJ; Egan P; Tuan J; Solano MA; Fizpatrick N
    Vet Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 30378125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure.
    Patel RM; Cayo M; Patel A; Albarillo M; Puri L
    Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e641-6. PubMed ID: 22588404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adhesive strips versus subcuticular suture for mediansternotomy wound closure.
    Lazar HL; McCann J; Fitzgerald CA; Cabral HJ
    J Card Surg; 2011 Jul; 26(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 21554389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Zinc-based subcuticular absorbable staples: An in vivo and in vitro study.
    Yang N; Venezuela J; Allavena R; Lau C; Dargusch M
    Acta Biomater; 2023 Sep; 167():593-607. PubMed ID: 37369266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subcuticular closure versus Dermabond: a prospective randomized trial.
    Switzer EF; Dinsmore RC; North JH
    Am Surg; 2003 May; 69(5):434-6. PubMed ID: 12769218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aesthetic and functional efficacy of subcuticular running epidermal closures of the trunk and extremity: a rater-blinded randomized control trial.
    Alam M; Posten W; Martini MC; Wrone DA; Rademaker AW
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Oct; 142(10):1272-8. PubMed ID: 17043181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.