These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19798600)
1. [Improvement and decision-making process of an article]. Matías-Guiu J; García Ramos R Neurologia; 2009; 24(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 19798600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts. Enquselassie F Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process. Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review. Scarfe WC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial. Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.]. Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance? Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996. Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of medical journals with special reference to the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. Aly AM Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S18-20. PubMed ID: 14968186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of the manuscript reviewer. Peh WC; Ng KH Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. You're a published author! Wachs JE; Williamson G; Moore PV; Roy D; Childre F AAOHN J; 2010 Jun; 58(6):233-6. PubMed ID: 20677718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Significance of letters published in the Dutch Journal of Medicine, 1997/98]. Mahesh S; Kabos M; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(11):531-5. PubMed ID: 11284288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [When the editor makes an error]. Hem E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing]. Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]