These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19799095)

  • 1. Determining daily physical activity levels of youth with developmental disabilities: days of monitoring required?
    Kim SY; Yun J
    Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2009 Jul; 26(3):220-35. PubMed ID: 19799095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources and magnitude of variability in pedometer-determined physical activity levels of youth.
    Kim SY; Park HS
    J Exerc Rehabil; 2015 Dec; 11(6):363-6. PubMed ID: 26730388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: the Canadian Physical Activity Levels among Youth study.
    Craig CL; Tudor-Locke C; Cragg S; Cameron C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Mar; 42(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19952820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of pedometer steps and time for youth with disabilities.
    Beets MW; Combs C; Pitetti KH; Morgan M; Bryan RR; Foley JT
    Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2007 Jul; 24(3):228-44. PubMed ID: 17916919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of pedometer steps and time for youth with intellectual disabilities during dynamic movements.
    Pitetti KH; Beets MW; Flaming J
    Adapt Phys Activ Q; 2009 Oct; 26(4):336-51. PubMed ID: 19893071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review of studies using pedometers to promote physical activity among youth.
    Lubans DR; Morgan PJ; Tudor-Locke C
    Prev Med; 2009 Apr; 48(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 19249328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical activity among adults with intellectual disabilities living in community settings.
    Peterson JJ; Janz KF; Lowe JB
    Prev Med; 2008 Jul; 47(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 18308385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The feasibility of using pedometers for self-report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18-month intervention.
    Ptomey LT; Willis EA; Lee J; Washburn RA; Gibson CA; Honas JJ; Donnelly JE
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2017 Aug; 61(8):792-801. PubMed ID: 28707359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Convergent validity of pedometer and accelerometer estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity of youth.
    Beets MW; Morgan CF; Banda JA; Bornstein D; Byun W; Mitchell J; Munselle L; Rooney L; Beighle A; Erwin H
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 Sep; 8 Suppl 2():S295-305. PubMed ID: 21918244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
    Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patterns of habitual physical activity in youth with and without Prader-Willi Syndrome.
    Castner DM; Tucker JM; Wilson KS; Rubin DA
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):3081-8. PubMed ID: 25129202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Descriptive epidemiology of youth pedometer-determined physical activity: CANPLAY.
    Craig CL; Cameron C; Griffiths JM; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Sep; 42(9):1639-43. PubMed ID: 20142780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Waist circumference, pedometer placement, and step-counting accuracy in youth.
    Abel MG; Hannon JC; Eisenman PA; Ransdell LB; Pett M; Williams DP
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2009 Sep; 80(3):434-44. PubMed ID: 19791629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the Actigraph to measure physical activity of people with disabilities: an investigation into measurement issues.
    Khemthong S; Packer TL; Dhaliwal SS
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2006 Dec; 29(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 17106348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of activity monitor location and bout duration on free-living physical activity.
    Heil DP; Bennett GG; Bond KS; Webster MD; Wolin KY
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2009 Sep; 80(3):424-33. PubMed ID: 19791628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pedometer variance in adults with Down syndrome during free walking: a generalizability study.
    Pitchford EA; Yun J
    J Phys Act Health; 2011 Nov; 8(8):1143-51. PubMed ID: 22039133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How many days of accelerometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity behaviour in obese youth?
    Vanhelst J; Fardy PS; Duhamel A; Béghin L
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2014 Sep; 34(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 24289304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of children's activity type with accelerometer-based neural networks.
    de Vries SI; Engels M; Garre FG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Oct; 43(10):1994-9. PubMed ID: 21448085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing walking behaviors of selected subpopulations.
    Le Masurier GC; Bauman AE; Corbin CB; Konopack JF; Umstattd RM; VAN Emmerik RE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Jul; 40(7 Suppl):S594-602. PubMed ID: 18562977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and Validity of Objective Measures of Physical Activity in Youth With Cerebral Palsy Who Are Ambulatory.
    O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham M; Lennon N; George A; Forman J; Trost SG
    Phys Ther; 2016 Jan; 96(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 26089043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.