These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19799166)

  • 1. Kinematic analysis of early online control of goal-directed reaches: a novel movement perturbation study.
    Grierson LE; Gonzalez C; Elliott D
    Motor Control; 2009 Jul; 13(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 19799166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effector mass and trajectory optimization in the online regulation of goal-directed movement.
    Burkitt JJ; Staite V; Yeung A; Elliott D; Lyons JL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1097-107. PubMed ID: 25567091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.
    Akram SB; Miyasike-daSilva V; Van Ooteghem K; McIlroy WE
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 229(4):609-19. PubMed ID: 23811736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.
    Bédard P; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15029468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of target context and early and late vision on goal-directed reaching.
    Roberts J; Burkitt JJ; Willemse B; Ludzki A; Lyons J; Elliott D; Grierson LE
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 229(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 23793508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?
    Ghafouri M; McIlroy WE; Maki BE
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 14985902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of real and illusory perturbations on the early trajectory adjustments of goal-directed movements.
    Grierson LE; Lyons J; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(5):383-91. PubMed ID: 21861628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.
    Sarlegna FR; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 16896981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual guidance for hand advance but not hand withdrawal in a reach-to-eat task in adult humans: reaching is a composite movement.
    de Bruin N; Sacrey LA; Brown LA; Doan J; Whishaw IQ
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Jul; 40(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 18628110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?
    Goodman R; Tremblay L
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1897-1910. PubMed ID: 29696313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.
    Bagesteiro LB; Sarlegna FR; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):358-70. PubMed ID: 16307242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp.
    Winges SA; Weber DJ; Santello M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 152(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 12898088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid online selection between multiple motor plans.
    Nashed JY; Crevecoeur F; Scott SH
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(5):1769-80. PubMed ID: 24478359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.
    Fan J; He J; Tillery SI
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 16307238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes to online control and eye-hand coordination with healthy ageing.
    O'Rielly JL; Ma-Wyatt A
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Jun; 59():244-257. PubMed ID: 29747069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When adaptive control fails: Slow recovery of reduced rapid online control during reaching under reversed vision.
    Kuang S; Gail A
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):155-65. PubMed ID: 25218421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.
    Gage WH; Zabjek KF; Hill SW; McIlroy WE
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(4):627-37. PubMed ID: 17487477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.
    Grosskopf A; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):230-40. PubMed ID: 16078023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual monitoring of goal-directed aiming movements.
    Brière J; Proteau L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):736-749. PubMed ID: 26902290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reach endpoint errors do not vary with movement path of the proprioceptive target.
    Jones SA; Byrne PA; Fiehler K; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 107(12):3316-24. PubMed ID: 22402658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.