These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

776 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19799473)

  • 1. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
    Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
    Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
    Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
    Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Parthan A; Walli-Attaei M; Chandler DB; Lyman GH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 24657302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
    Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
    Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer.
    Aapro MS; Chaplin S; Cornes P; Howe S; Link H; Koptelova N; Mehl A; Di Palma M; Schroader BK; Terkola R
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep; 31(10):581. PubMed ID: 37728795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer in Taiwan.
    Tseng TH; Chiang SC; Hsu JC; Ko Y
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303294. PubMed ID: 38857244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
    Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.
    Aapro MS; Bohlius J; Cameron DA; Dal Lago L; Donnelly JP; Kearney N; Lyman GH; Pettengell R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Walewski J; Weber DC; Zielinski C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):8-32. PubMed ID: 21095116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Numnum TM; Kimball KJ; Rocconi RP; Kilgore LC; Straughn JM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17386043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
    Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PEG-rhG-CSF in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in China].
    Xia W; Wang SS; Hu H; Zhao FL; Xu F; Hong RX; Jiang KK; Yuan ZY; Shi YX; Zhao K; Huang JJ; Xue C; Bi XW; Lu QY; An X; Zhang JM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 42(10):861-867. PubMed ID: 33113628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.