BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

772 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19799473)

  • 21. Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early node-positive breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Wolowacz SE; Cameron DA; Tate HC; Bagust A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Feb; 26(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 18281666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to support delivery of chemotherapy: twenty years of clinical experience.
    Renwick W; Pettengell R; Green M
    BioDrugs; 2009; 23(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 19627169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
    Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study.
    von Minckwitz G; Kümmel S; du Bois A; Eiermann W; Eidtmann H; Gerber B; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Costa SD; Jackisch C; Grasshoff ST; Vescia S; Skacel T; Loibl S; Mehta KM; Kaufmann M;
    Ann Oncol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 17846019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.
    Lee EK; Wong WW; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Economic analysis of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
    Eldar-Lissai A; Cosler LE; Culakova E; Lyman GH
    Value Health; 2008; 11(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 18380630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
    De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review.
    Pfeil AM; Allcott K; Pettengell R; von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Szabo Z
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Feb; 23(2):525-45. PubMed ID: 25284721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Granulocyte colony--stimulating factor for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer : the 40% rule revisited.
    Calhoun EA; Schumock GT; McKoy JM; Pickard S; Fitzner KA; Heckinger EA; Powell EF; McCaffrey KR; Bennett CL
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2005; 23(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 16097839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel approach to maintain planned dose chemotherapy on time: a decision-making tool to improve patient care.
    Lyman GH
    Eur J Cancer; 2000 Apr; 36 Suppl 1():S15-21. PubMed ID: 10785605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.