BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19800379)

  • 1. Review of animal models designed to predict the potential allergenicity of novel proteins in genetically modified crops.
    Ladics GS; Knippels LM; Penninks AH; Bannon GA; Goodman RE; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 19800379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
    Ladics GS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.
    Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Murine models for evaluating the allergenicity of novel proteins and foods.
    Aldemir H; Bars R; Herouet-Guicheney C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S52-7. PubMed ID: 19100305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified soybean protein extract in a murine model of oral allergen-specific sensitization.
    Gizzarelli F; Corinti S; Barletta B; Iacovacci P; Brunetto B; Butteroni C; Afferni C; Onori R; Miraglia M; Panzini G; Di Felice G; Tinghino R
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2006 Feb; 36(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 16433863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IgE binding to proteins from sesame and assessment of allergenicity: implications for biotechnology?
    Orruño E; Morgan MR
    Biotechnol Lett; 2006 Dec; 28(23):1877-88. PubMed ID: 17028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Mar; 102(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 18033772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approaches to assessment of the allergenic potential of novel proteins in food from genetically modified crops.
    Kimber I; Dearman RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2002 Jul; 68(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 12075104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
    Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro.
    Astwood JD; Leach JN; Fuchs RL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Oct; 14(10):1269-73. PubMed ID: 9631091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity.
    Silvanovich A; Nemeth MA; Song P; Herman R; Tagliani L; Bannon GA
    Toxicol Sci; 2006 Mar; 90(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 16338955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of rodent models for evaluating protein allergenicity.
    Bowman CC; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 18957311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Animal models for assessment of GMO allergenicity: advantages and limitations].
    Adel-Patient K; Wal JM
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Mar; 36(3):88-91. PubMed ID: 15137477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of protein allergenicity: studies in brown norway rats.
    Knippels LM; Penninks AH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2002 May; 964():151-61. PubMed ID: 12023202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety assessment by in vitro digestibility and allergenicity of genetically modified maize with an amaranth 11S globulin.
    Sinagawa-García SR; Rascón-Cruz Q; Valdez-Ortiz A; Medina-Godoy S; Escobar-Gutiérrez A; Paredes-López O
    J Agric Food Chem; 2004 May; 52(9):2709-14. PubMed ID: 15113180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.