630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19800727)
1. Lateralized effects of categorical and coordinate spatial processing of component parts on the recognition of 3D non-nameable objects.
Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19800727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
Okubo M; Michimata C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs.
van der Lubbe RH; Schölvinck ML; Kenemans JL; Postma A
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1547-59. PubMed ID: 16513145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.
Okubo M; Michimata C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Categorical and coordinate spatial representations within object-location memory.
van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 18387555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Categorical and coordinate processing in object recognition depends on different spatial frequencies.
Saneyoshi A; Michimata C
Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 25236965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The time course of hemispheric differences in categorical and coordinate spatial processing.
van der Ham IJ; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; Postma A
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2492-8. PubMed ID: 17499820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Language suppression effects on the categorical perception of colour as evidenced through ERPs.
Liu Q; Li H; Campos JL; Teeter C; Tao W; Zhang Q; Sun HJ
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 20466034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemispheric processing of categorical/metric properties in object recognition.
Saneyoshi A; Kaminaga T; Michimata C
Neuroreport; 2006 Apr; 17(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 16543817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A possible connection between categorical and coordinate spatial relation representations.
Niebauer CL
Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):434-45. PubMed ID: 11748899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS.
Trojano L; Conson M; Maffei R; Grossi D
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1569-74. PubMed ID: 16529780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
Borst G; Kosslyn SM
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2769-72. PubMed ID: 20434469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing: more on contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system.
Hellige JB; Cumberland N
Brain Cogn; 2001 Mar; 45(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 11237364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of stimulus features on working memory of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in patients with unilateral brain damage.
van der Ham IJ; van Wezel RJ; Oleksiak A; van Zandvoort MJ; Frijns CJ; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):737-45. PubMed ID: 21470602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A left cerebral hemisphere's superiority in processing spatial-categorical information in a non-verbal semantic format.
Suegami T; Laeng B
Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 23290044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers.
Motes MA; Malach R; Kozhevnikov M
Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1727-31. PubMed ID: 18852681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
