175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19801692)
1. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Cheung KW; Chiu KH
Hong Kong Med J; 2009 Oct; 15(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 19801692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision of Ci-navigated extension and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty and analysis of potential predictive variables.
Fickert S; Jawhar A; Sunil P; Scharf HP
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 22072193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of limb alignment, component positioning, and function in primary total knee arthroplasty using a pinless navigation technique compared with conventional methods.
Keyes BJ; Markel DC; Meneghini RM
J Knee Surg; 2013 Apr; 26(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 23288760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Choi Y; Kwon OR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19122074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.
Matziolis G; Krocker D; Weiss U; Tohtz S; Perka C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 17272435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases.
Zorman D; Etuin P; Jennart H; Scipioni D; Devos S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2005 Dec; 71(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 16459860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial.
Gøthesen O; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Petursson G; Hallan G; Strøm E; Dyrhovden G; Furnes O
Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 24788494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Articular surface mounted navigated total knee arthroplasty improves the reliability of component alignment.
Clement ND; MacDonald D; Burgess AG; Howie CR
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 28210787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evaluation of post-operative alignment in total knee replacement using a CT-based navigation system.
Mizu-uchi H; Matsuda S; Miura H; Okazaki K; Akasaki Y; Iwamoto Y
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1025-31. PubMed ID: 18669957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial.
Kalairajah Y; Cossey AJ; Verrall GM; Ludbrook G; Spriggins AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 16434523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation.
Lützner J; Krummenauer F; Wolf C; Günther KP; Kirschner S
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1039-44. PubMed ID: 18669959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy.
Martin A; Wohlgenannt O; Prenn M; Oelsch C; von Strempel A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jul; 460():178-84. PubMed ID: 17620811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
