These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19802660)
21. Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy. Schnurr C; Michael JW; Eysel P; König DP Int Orthop; 2009 Apr; 33(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 18157534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of conventional guidewire alignment jigs with imageless computer navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Olsen M; Chiu M; Gamble P; Boyle RA; Tumia N; Schemitsch EH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Aug; 92(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 20686057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion]. Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial]. Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Christian Wirtz D; Mumme T Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Aug; 53(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 18643714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system. Nakahara I; Kyo T; Kuroda Y; Miki H J Artif Organs; 2018 Sep; 21(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 29611147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No added value for Computer-Assisted surgery to improve femoral component positioning and Patient Reported Outcomes in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty; a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Koper MC; Reijman M; van Es EM; Waarsing JH; Koot HWJ; Keizer SB; Jansen I; van Biezen FC; Verhaar JAN; Bos PK BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):473. PubMed ID: 31651318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty. Kyo T; Nakahara I; Kuroda Y; Miki H Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 26290170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Kitada M; Sakai T; Murase T; Hanada T; Nakamura N; Sugano N Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23460526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Functionality and accuracy of a fluoroscopic navigation system in the placement of the femoral component for hip resurfacing - a cadaver study]. Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Wirtz D; Mumme T Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 18561082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K; Mumme T Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20476504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Hart R; Sváb P; Filan P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 18071723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Pitto RP; Malak S; Anderson IA Int Orthop; 2009 Apr; 33(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 18758776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT-based Navigation System Using a Patient-Specific Instrument for Femoral Component Positioning: An Experimental in vitro Study with a Sawbone Model. Lee S; Kim JY; Hong J; Baek SH; Kim SY Yonsei Med J; 2018 Aug; 59(6):769-780. PubMed ID: 29978614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of accuracy of acetabular cup orientation in CT-free navigated total hip arthroplasty. Fukunishi S; Fukui T; Imamura F; Nishio S Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Pasquier G; Ducharne G; Ali ES; Giraud F; Mouttet A; Durante E Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 96(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 20471935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. Kitada M; Nakamura N; Iwana D; Kakimoto A; Nishii T; Sugano N J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):674-9. PubMed ID: 20870379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? Kalteis T; Handel M; Bäthis H; Perlick L; Tingart M; Grifka J J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 16434517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]