These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19803594)

  • 1. Looking at the bright side: the affective monitoring of direction.
    Phaf RH; Rotteveel M
    Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 19803594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The combined effect of gaze direction and facial expression on cueing spatial attention.
    Pecchinenda A; Pes M; Ferlazzo F; Zoccolotti P
    Emotion; 2008 Oct; 8(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 18837612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit and explicit memory for affective passages in temporal lobectomy patients.
    Burton LA; Rabin L; Vardy SB; Frohlich J; Porter GW; Dimitri D; Cofer L; Labar D
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 18378375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What the experimenter's prime tells the observer's brain.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1367-76. PubMed ID: 20601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.
    Kazandjian S; Dupierrix E; Gaash E; Love IY; Zivotofsky AZ; De Agostini M; Chokron S
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():133-41. PubMed ID: 18973747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
    Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences in implicit and explicit memory for affective passages.
    Burton LA; Rabin L; Vardy SB; Frohlich J; Wyatt G; Dimitri D; Constante S; Guterman E
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 15050778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of peripheral and motivational cues on rigid-flexible functioning: Perceptual, behavioral, and cognitive aspects.
    Cretenet J; Dru V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):201-17. PubMed ID: 19397380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective view of the impact of prime validity on response speed and selection in the arrow classification task with free choice trials.
    Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 20139465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Playing TETRIS for science counter-regulatory affective processing in a motivationally "hot" context.
    Wentura D; Voss A; Rothermund K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 19555920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions.
    Eder AB; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 18473659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence.
    Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 17516810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional bias for smoking and affective stimuli: a Stroop task study.
    Drobes DJ; Elibero A; Evans DE
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2006 Dec; 20(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 17176185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic and affective salience: the role of meaning and preference in attentional capture and disengagement.
    Biggs AT; Kreager RD; Gibson BS; Villano M; Crowell CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 22390289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes?
    Centerbar DB; Clore GL
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16371140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can actions affect perceptual processing?
    Müsseler J; Steininger S; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):137-54. PubMed ID: 11216313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.