861 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19803636)
1. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the difference between working memory and attentional set.
Olivers CN; Eimer M
Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1553-8. PubMed ID: 21145332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters.
Han SW; Kim MS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1292-302. PubMed ID: 19803637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
Pan Y
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
Lamy D; Egeth HE
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
Lamy D; Zoaris L
Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task.
Jolicoeur P; Brisson B; Robitaille N
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():160-72. PubMed ID: 18482718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
Burnham BR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.
Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):364-79. PubMed ID: 16634676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
Amso D; Johnson SP
Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
