These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19803680)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cue-target interval on the N2pc.
    Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17001287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc.
    Brisson B; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of the stare-in-the-crowd effect.
    Doi H; Ueda K; Shinohara K
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19046979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The N2pc component and stimulus duration.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1163-6. PubMed ID: 17589319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments.
    Sim EJ; Kiefer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 15993764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects.
    Van der Burg E; Talsma D; Olivers CN; Hickey C; Theeuwes J
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1208-18. PubMed ID: 21195781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appearing and disappearing stimuli trigger a reflexive modulation of visual cortical activity.
    Hopfinger JB; Maxwell JS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15907377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender related differences in visual and auditory processing of verbal and figural tasks.
    Jausovec N; Jausovec K
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1300():135-45. PubMed ID: 19747461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs.
    Verleger R; Śmigasiewicz K; Möller F
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1096-106. PubMed ID: 21265863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.