284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19804431)
1. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib for second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Hoyle M; Green C; Thompson-Coon J; Liu Z; Welch K; Moxham T; Stein K
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19804431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of temsirolimus for first line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Hoyle M; Green C; Thompson-Coon J; Liu Z; Welch K; Moxham T; Stein K
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19804430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib compared to best supportive care in second line renal cell cancer from a payer perspective in Cyprus.
Petrou PK; Talias MA
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Feb; 14(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 24397606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bevacizumab, sorafenib tosylate, sunitinib and temsirolimus for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Thompson Coon J; Hoyle M; Green C; Liu Z; Welch K; Moxham T; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jan; 14(2):1-184, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 20028613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of everolimus versus sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of first-line sunitinib.
Casciano R; Chulikavit M; Di Lorenzo G; Liu Z; Baladi JF; Wang X; Robertson J; Garrison L
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):846-51. PubMed ID: 21914504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Economic evaluation of targeted biologic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma].
Ondrácková B; Demlová R; Komínek J
Klin Onkol; 2010; 23(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 21351422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Carr BI; Carroll S; Muszbek N; Gondek K
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Nov; 25(11):1739-46. PubMed ID: 21039835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Connock M; Round J; Bayliss S; Tubeuf S; Greenheld W; Moore D
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14 Suppl 1():17-21. PubMed ID: 20507799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus or bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a review of health economic evaluations.
Norum J; Nieder C; Kondo M
J Chemother; 2010 Apr; 22(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 20435564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of new targeted therapies for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Benedict A; Figlin RA; Sandström P; Harmenberg U; Ullén A; Charbonneau C; Sandin R; Remák E; Hariharan S; Négrier S
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 21265994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain.
Calvo Aller E; Maroto P; Kreif N; González Larriba JL; López-Brea M; Castellano D; Martí B; Díaz Cerezo S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2011 Dec; 13(12):869-77. PubMed ID: 22126730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.
Purmonen T; Martikainen JA; Soini EJ; Kataja V; Vuorinen RL; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 18343276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Egypt.
Hamdy Elsisi G; Nada Y; Rashad N; Carapinha J
J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 30479174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Remák E; Charbonneau C; Négrier S; Kim ST; Motzer RJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(24):3995-4000. PubMed ID: 18711190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of axitinib through a probabilistic decision model.
Petrou P
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2015 Jun; 16(8):1233-43. PubMed ID: 25958963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential health gains for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in daily clinical practice: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential first- and second-line treatments.
De Groot S; Blommestein HM; Redekop WK; Sleijfer S; Kiemeney LALM; Oosterwijk E; Uyl-de Groot CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177364. PubMed ID: 28531203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom.
Amdahl J; Diaz J; Sharma A; Park J; Chandiwana D; Delea TE
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0175920. PubMed ID: 28636648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiviral therapy in patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
Zhang P; Yang Y; Wen F; Wheeler J; Fu P; Li Q
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 27118432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of everolimus for second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Serbia.
Mihajlović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Sabo A; Tomić Z; Postma MJ
Clin Ther; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1909-22. PubMed ID: 24238790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib treatment in field practice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cammà C; Cabibbo G; Petta S; Enea M; Iavarone M; Grieco A; Gasbarrini A; Villa E; Zavaglia C; Bruno R; Colombo M; Craxì A; ;
Hepatology; 2013 Mar; 57(3):1046-54. PubMed ID: 23299720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
