These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19804523)

  • 1. The use of Hemastix and the subsequent lack of DNA recovery using the Promega DNA IQ system.
    Poon H; Elliott J; Modler J; Frégeau C
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1278-86. PubMed ID: 19804523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of Hemastix® severely reduces DNA recovery using the BioRobot® EZ1.
    Petersen D; Kaplan M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 May; 56(3):733-5. PubMed ID: 21361957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Preliminary tests with Hemastix and Sangur test strips and Phosphatesmo KM test paper do not modify DNA typing of blood and semen stains].
    Liechti-Gallati S; Borer U
    Arch Kriminol; 1994; 193(1-2):37-42. PubMed ID: 7908512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemical enhancement techniques of bloodstain patterns and DNA recovery after fire exposure.
    Tontarski KL; Hoskins KA; Watkins TG; Brun-Conti L; Michaud AL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 19018938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving efficiency of a small forensic DNA laboratory: validation of robotic assays and evaluation of microcapillary array device.
    Crouse CA; Yeung S; Greenspoon S; McGuckian A; Sikorsky J; Ban J; Mathies R
    Croat Med J; 2005 Aug; 46(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 16100759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple automated instrument for DNA extraction in forensic casework.
    Montpetit SA; Fitch IT; O'Donnell PT
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):555-63. PubMed ID: 15932086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Estimating the efficiency of DNA isolation methods in semen, blood and saliva stains using the QuantiBlot system].
    Prośniak A; Gloc E; Berent J; Babol-Pokora K; Jacewicz R; Szram S
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16708611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of presumptive blood test kits including hexagon OBTI.
    Johnston E; Ames CE; Dagnall KE; Foster J; Daniel BE
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):687-9. PubMed ID: 18471215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic evaluation of the QIAshredder/QIAamp DNA extraction procedure.
    Castella V; Dimo-Simonin N; Brandt-Casadevall C; Mangin P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 16326058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of presumptive tests for non-human blood using Kastle Meyer and Hemastix reagents.
    Casali F; Ciavaglia SA; Gannicliffe C; Lidstone N; Webster LMI
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jan; 60(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 31924286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a DNA IQ-based extraction method for TECAN robotic liquid handling workstations for processing casework.
    Frégeau CJ; Lett CM; Fourney RM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Oct; 4(5):292-304. PubMed ID: 20457033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparing and evaluating six methods of extracting human genomic DNA from whole blood].
    Chang JJ; Zhang SH; Li L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-11, 114. PubMed ID: 19537249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental validation of the PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit for extraction of genomic DNA from biological samples.
    Brevnov MG; Pawar HS; Mundt J; Calandro LM; Furtado MR; Shewale JG
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 19302383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of luminol on presumptive tests and DNA analysis using the polymerase chain reaction.
    Gross AM; Harris KA; Kaldun GL
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Jul; 44(4):837-40. PubMed ID: 10432617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the BioMek 2000 Laboratory Automation Workstation and the DNA IQ System to the extraction of forensic casework samples.
    Greenspoon SA; Ban JD; Sykes K; Ballard EJ; Edler SS; Baisden M; Covington BL
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 14979341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation and validation of the Teleshake unit for DNA IQ robotic extraction and development of a large volume DNA IQ method.
    Grubb JC; Horsman-Hall KM; Sykes KL; Schlisserman RA; Covert VM; Rhee HN; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 May; 55(3):706-14. PubMed ID: 20345792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimized manual and automated recovery of amplifiable DNA from tissues preserved in buffered formalin and alcohol-based fixative.
    Duval K; Aubin RA; Elliott J; Gorn-Hondermann I; Birnboim HC; Jonker D; Fourney RM; Frégeau CJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 20129465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for DNA and RNA co-extraction for use on forensic samples using the Promega DNA IQ™ system.
    Bowden A; Fleming R; Harbison S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 20457058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material.
    Walsh PS; Metzger DA; Higuchi R
    Biotechniques; 1991 Apr; 10(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 1867860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.