These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
740 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19805137)
21. Mismatch repair balances leading and lagging strand DNA replication fidelity. Lujan SA; Williams JS; Pursell ZF; Abdulovic-Cui AA; Clark AB; Nick McElhinny SA; Kunkel TA PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(10):e1003016. PubMed ID: 23071460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fidelity of mammalian DNA replication and replicative DNA polymerases. Thomas DC; Roberts JD; Sabatino RD; Myers TW; Tan CK; Downey KM; So AG; Bambara RA; Kunkel TA Biochemistry; 1991 Dec; 30(51):11751-9. PubMed ID: 1751492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Unique error signature of the four-subunit yeast DNA polymerase epsilon. Shcherbakova PV; Pavlov YI; Chilkova O; Rogozin IB; Johansson E; Kunkel TA J Biol Chem; 2003 Oct; 278(44):43770-80. PubMed ID: 12882968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Functional Analysis of Cancer-Associated DNA Polymerase ε Variants in Barbari SR; Kane DP; Moore EA; Shcherbakova PV G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Mar; 8(3):1019-1029. PubMed ID: 29352080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mutator suppression and escape from replication error-induced extinction in yeast. Herr AJ; Ogawa M; Lawrence NA; Williams LN; Eggington JM; Singh M; Smith RA; Preston BD PLoS Genet; 2011 Oct; 7(10):e1002282. PubMed ID: 22022273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA polymerase ε and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. Church DN; Briggs SE; Palles C; Domingo E; Kearsey SJ; Grimes JM; Gorman M; Martin L; Howarth KM; Hodgson SV; ; Kaur K; Taylor J; Tomlinson IP Hum Mol Genet; 2013 Jul; 22(14):2820-8. PubMed ID: 23528559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evidence that DNA polymerase δ contributes to initiating leading strand DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Garbacz MA; Lujan SA; Burkholder AB; Cox PB; Wu Q; Zhou ZX; Haber JE; Kunkel TA Nat Commun; 2018 Feb; 9(1):858. PubMed ID: 29487291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Polymerase dynamics at the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Burgers PM J Biol Chem; 2009 Feb; 284(7):4041-5. PubMed ID: 18835809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase ε holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis. Abdulovic AL; Hile SE; Kunkel TA; Eckert KA DNA Repair (Amst); 2011 May; 10(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 21429821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Increased contribution of DNA polymerase delta to the leading strand replication in yeast with an impaired CMG helicase complex. Dmowski M; Jedrychowska M; Makiela-Dzbenska K; Denkiewicz-Kruk M; Sharma S; Chabes A; Araki H; Fijalkowska IJ DNA Repair (Amst); 2022 Feb; 110():103272. PubMed ID: 35038632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Replicative DNA polymerase defects in human cancers: Consequences, mechanisms, and implications for therapy. Barbari SR; Shcherbakova PV DNA Repair (Amst); 2017 Aug; 56():16-25. PubMed ID: 28687338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fidelity consequences of the impaired interaction between DNA polymerase epsilon and the GINS complex. Garbacz M; Araki H; Flis K; Bebenek A; Zawada AE; Jonczyk P; Makiela-Dzbenska K; Fijalkowska IJ DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 May; 29():23-35. PubMed ID: 25758782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mismatch repair operates at the replication fork in direct competition with mismatch extension by DNA polymerase δ. Klassen R; Gangavarapu V; Johnson RE; Prakash L; Prakash S J Biol Chem; 2023 Apr; 299(4):104598. PubMed ID: 36898578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reconstitution of Bowen N; Kolodner RD Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(14):3607-3612. PubMed ID: 28265089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mismatch repair-independent tandem repeat sequence instability resulting from ribonucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerase ε. Clark AB; Lujan SA; Kissling GE; Kunkel TA DNA Repair (Amst); 2011 May; 10(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 21414850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Active site mutations in mammalian DNA polymerase delta alter accuracy and replication fork progression. Schmitt MW; Venkatesan RN; Pillaire MJ; Hoffmann JS; Sidorova JM; Loeb LA J Biol Chem; 2010 Oct; 285(42):32264-72. PubMed ID: 20628184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Shinbrot E; Henninger EE; Weinhold N; Covington KR; Göksenin AY; Schultz N; Chao H; Doddapaneni H; Muzny DM; Gibbs RA; Sander C; Pursell ZF; Wheeler DA Genome Res; 2014 Nov; 24(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 25228659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fidelity of DNA polymerase epsilon holoenzyme from budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Shimizu K; Hashimoto K; Kirchner JM; Nakai W; Nishikawa H; Resnick MA; Sugino A J Biol Chem; 2002 Oct; 277(40):37422-9. PubMed ID: 12124389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Explosive mutation accumulation triggered by heterozygous human Pol ε proofreading-deficiency is driven by suppression of mismatch repair. Hodel KP; de Borja R; Henninger EE; Campbell BB; Ungerleider N; Light N; Wu T; LeCompte KG; Goksenin AY; Bunnell BA; Tabori U; Shlien A; Pursell ZF Elife; 2018 Feb; 7():. PubMed ID: 29488881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality control mechanisms exclude incorrect polymerases from the eukaryotic replication fork. Schauer GD; O'Donnell ME Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jan; 114(4):675-680. PubMed ID: 28069954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]