These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19805241)

  • 1. In defense of statistical methods for detecting positive selection.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R; Goldman N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Sep; 106(36):E95; author reply E96. PubMed ID: 19805241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the number of one-step beneficial mutations.
    Wojtowicz AJ; Miller CR; Joyce P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jul; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 22850060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
    Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotypic relative risks under ordered restriction.
    Chiano MN; Clayton DG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 9554552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compound tests for the detection of hitchhiking under positive selection.
    Zeng K; Shi S; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Aug; 24(8):1898-908. PubMed ID: 17557886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of recombination on the accuracy of the likelihood method for detecting positive selection at amino acid sites.
    Anisimova M; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1229-36. PubMed ID: 12871927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation study of the reliability and robustness of the statistical methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Nov; 19(11):1865-9. PubMed ID: 12411595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing analysis methods for mutation-accumulation data.
    Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2004 May; 167(1):551-3. PubMed ID: 15166177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequent false detection of positive selection by the likelihood method with branch-site models.
    Zhang J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1332-9. PubMed ID: 15014150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilevel Factor Score Regression.
    Devlieger I; Rosseel Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(4):600-624. PubMed ID: 31505988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene conversion among paralogs results in moderate false detection of positive selection using likelihood methods.
    Casola C; Hahn MW
    J Mol Evol; 2009 Jun; 68(6):679-87. PubMed ID: 19471989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Properties of different selection signature statistics and a new strategy for combining them.
    Ma Y; Ding X; Qanbari S; Weigend S; Zhang Q; Simianer H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Nov; 115(5):426-36. PubMed ID: 25990878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Yang Z; dos Reis M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A likelihood method for the detection of selection and recombination using nucleotide sequences.
    Grassly NC; Holmes EC
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 9066792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
    Vy HM; Kim Y
    Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research?
    Molnar FJ; Hutton B; Fergusson D
    CMAJ; 2008 Oct; 179(8):751-3. PubMed ID: 18838445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A composite-likelihood approach for detecting directional selection from DNA sequence data.
    Zhu L; Bustamante CD
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1411-21. PubMed ID: 15879513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical power for detecting epistasis QTL effects under the F-2 design.
    Mao Y; Da Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2005; 37(2):129-50. PubMed ID: 16194521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.