BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19805418)

  • 1. Does brain activity at rest reflect adaptive strategies? Evidence from speech processing after cochlear implantation.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Demonet JF; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 May; 20(5):1217-22. PubMed ID: 19805418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of non-speech sound memory in postlingual deafness: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation.
    Lazard DS; Giraud AL; Truy E; Lee HJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2475-82. PubMed ID: 21557954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.
    Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual activity predicts auditory recovery from deafness after adult cochlear implantation.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Demonet JF; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Brain; 2013 Dec; 136(Pt 12):3682-95. PubMed ID: 24136826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restored speech comprehension linked to activity in left inferior prefrontal and right temporal cortices in postlingual deafness.
    Mortensen MV; Mirz F; Gjedde A
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):842-52. PubMed ID: 16459106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: report on 10 patients.
    Colletti V; Carner M; Miorelli V; Guida M; Colletti L; Fiorino FG
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 15744155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Detection of central auditory compensation in unilateral deafness with functional magnetic resonance tomography].
    Tschopp K; Schillinger C; Schmid N; Rausch M; Bilecen D; Scheffler K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Dec; 79(12):753-7. PubMed ID: 11199459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study.
    Pantev C; Dinnesen A; Ross B; Wollbrink A; Knief A
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jan; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15843632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V; Pasanisi E; Guida M; Di Trapani G; Sanna M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants: achievement in an intensive auditory-oral educational setting.
    Hayes H; Geers AE; Treiman R; Moog JS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 19125035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing of voices in deafness rehabilitation by auditory brainstem implant.
    Coez A; Zilbovicius M; Ferrary E; Bouccara D; Mosnier I; Ambert-Dahan E; Kalamarides M; Bizaguet E; Syrota A; Samson Y; Sterkers O
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1792-6. PubMed ID: 19481164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seeing speech and seeing sign: insights from a fMRI study.
    Campbell R; Capek C
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S3-9. PubMed ID: 19012106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map.
    Svirsky MA; Silveira A; Neuburger H; Teoh SW; Suárez H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15224858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.