These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19805755)
1. Tumour size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density. Nickson C; Kavanagh AM J Med Screen; 2009; 16(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19805755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic screening outcomes in Western Australia. Crouchley K; Wylie E; Khong E J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 16792833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis. Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recreational physical activity and mammographic breast density characteristics. Reeves KW; Gierach GL; Modugno F Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):934-42. PubMed ID: 17507619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer. Khan QJ; Kimler BF; O'Dea AP; Zalles CM; Sharma P; Fabian CJ Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(3):R35. PubMed ID: 17537236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening. Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interval breast cancer: is it a different type of breast cancer? Raja MA; Hubbard A; Salman AR Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 14965568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic importance of palpability as a feature of screen-detected breast cancers. Gill G; Luke C; Roder D J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 16792834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Breast self-examination also valuable in women participating in a screening programme]. Zonderhuis BM; Meijer S; Been J; Groot JJ; Langenhorst F; van den Tol MP Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2341-5. PubMed ID: 19024066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin and mammographic density in Japanese women. Nagata C; Matsubara T; Hara T; Fujita H; Nagao Y; Yamamoto S; Shibuya C; Kashiki Y; Shimizu H Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Nov; 16(11):2509-12. PubMed ID: 18006946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening younger women with a family history of breast cancer--does early detection improve outcome? Maurice A; Evans DG; Shenton A; Ashcroft L; Baildam A; Barr L; Byrne G; Bundred N; Boggis C; Wilson M; Duffy SW; Howell A Eur J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 42(10):1385-90. PubMed ID: 16750910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of mammographic service screening on stage at presentation of breast cancers in Sweden. Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2205-12. PubMed ID: 17471486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. Stone J; Dite GS; Giles GG; Cawson J; English DR; Hopper JL Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22539605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved survival rate for women with interval breast cancer - results from the breast cancer screening programme in Malmö, Sweden 1976-1999. Zackrisson S; Janzon L; Manjer J; Andersson I J Med Screen; 2007; 14(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 17925086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Kelemen LE; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Brandt KR; Wang A; Janney C; Fredericksen ZS; Cerhan JR; Vachon CM Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1027-36. PubMed ID: 18385204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interval cancer incidence and episode sensitivity in the Norrbotten Mammography Screening Programme, Sweden. Bordás P; Jonsson H; Nyström L; Lenner P J Med Screen; 2009; 16(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 19349530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some issues in screening for breast and other cancers. Duffy SW; McCann J; Godward S; Gabe R; Warwick J J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S28-34. PubMed ID: 17227639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study. Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]