174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19806800)
21. Evaluation of four pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in terms of perfusion quality and capturing gaseous microemboli.
Mathis RK; Lin J; Dogal NM; Qiu F; Kunselman A; Wang S; Ündar A
Perfusion; 2012 Nov; 27(6):470-9. PubMed ID: 22751383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microemboli generation, detection and characterization during CPB procedures in neonates, infants, and small children.
Win KN; Wang S; Undar A
ASAIO J; 2008; 54(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 18812739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Blood temperature management and gaseous microemboli creation: an in-vitro analysis.
Sleep J; Syhre I; Evans E
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2010 Sep; 42(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 21114225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Arterial Limb Microemboli during Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Observations from a Congenital Cardiac Surgery Practice.
Matte GS; Connor KR; Liu H; DiNardo JA; Faraoni D; Pigula F
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2016 Mar; 48(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 27134302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro air removal characteristics of two neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass systems: filtration may lead to fractionation of bubbles.
Stehouwer MC; Kelder JC; van Oeveren W; de Vroege R
Int J Artif Organs; 2014 Sep; 37(9):688-96. PubMed ID: 25262633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study.
Rider SP; Simon LV; Rice BJ; Poulton CC
J Extra Corpor Technol; 1998 Dec; 30(4):160-5. PubMed ID: 10537575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Delivery of gaseous microemboli with vacuum-assisted venous drainage during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass model.
Wang S; Baer L; Kunselman AR; Myers JL; Undar A
ASAIO J; 2008; 54(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 18645361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of two different blood pumps on delivery of gaseous microemboli during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in a simulated infant CPB model.
Wang S; Kunselman AR; Myers JL; Undar A
ASAIO J; 2008; 54(5):538-41. PubMed ID: 18812749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage, angel or demon: PRO?
Durandy Y
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2013 Jun; 45(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 23930382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli?
Jones TJ; Deal DD; Vernon JC; Blackburn N; Stump DA
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2002 Mar; 34(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11911627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In Vitro Comparison of Pediatric Oxygenators With and Without Integrated Arterial Filters in Maintaining Optimal Hemodynamic Stability and Managing Gaseous Microemboli.
Moroi M; Force M; Wang S; Kunselman AR; Ündar A
Artif Organs; 2018 Apr; 42(4):420-431. PubMed ID: 29377185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An In-Vitro Study Comparing the GME Handling of Two Contemporary Oxygenators.
Gisnarian CJ; Hedman A; Shann KG
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2017 Dec; 49(4):262-272. PubMed ID: 29302117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Removal of Gross Air Embolization from Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits with Integrated Arterial Line Filters: A Comparison of Circuit Designs.
Reagor JA; Holt DW
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2016 Mar; 48(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 27134304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of Normobaric versus Hypobaric Oxygenation on Gaseous Microemboli Removal in a Diffusion Membrane Oxygenator: An In Vitro Comparison.
Schuldes M; Riley JB; Francis SG; Clingan S
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):129-136. PubMed ID: 27729706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimizing venous drainage using an ultrasonic flow probe on the venous line.
Walker JL; Young HA; Lawson DS; Husain SA; Calhoon JH
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2011 Sep; 43(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 22164455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of HL-20 roller pump and Rotaflow centrifugal pump on perfusion quality and gaseous microemboli delivery.
Yee S; Qiu F; Su X; Rider A; Kunselman AR; Guan Y; Undar A
Artif Organs; 2010 Nov; 34(11):937-43. PubMed ID: 20946282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microemboli in our bypass circuits: a contemporary audit.
Willcox TW; Mitchell SJ
J Extra Corpor Technol; 2009 Dec; 41(4):P31-7. PubMed ID: 20092085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of neonatal membrane oxygenators with respect to gaseous microemboli capture and transmembrane pressure gradients.
Qiu F; Guan Y; Su X; Kunselman A; Undar A
Artif Organs; 2010 Nov; 34(11):923-9. PubMed ID: 21092035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In-Vitro Evaluation of Two Types of Neonatal Oxygenators in Handling Gaseous Microemboli and Maintaining Optimal Hemodynamic Stability During Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Marupudi N; Wang S; Canêo LF; Jatene FB; Kunselman AR; Undar A
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2016; 31(5):343-350. PubMed ID: 27982342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of gaseous microemboli counts in arterial, simultaneous and venous heat exchange with a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator.
Sutton RG; Riley JB; Merrill JH
J Extra Corpor Technol; 1994; 26(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 10147369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
