These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

761 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19808628)

  • 1. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Dieringer MA; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):736-42. PubMed ID: 21342775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jun; 12(1):36. PubMed ID: 20573227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The aortic Elan stentless aortic valve: excellent hemodynamics and ease of implantation.
    Flynn M; Iaccovoni A; Pathi V; Butler J; Macarthur KJ; Berg GA
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):48-54. PubMed ID: 11805949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures.
    Torii R; El-Hamamsy I; Donya M; Babu-Narayan SV; Ibrahim M; Kilner PJ; Mohiaddin RH; Xu XY; Yacoub MH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 22361248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: anesthetic considerations.
    Billings FT; Kodali SK; Shanewise JS
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1453-62. PubMed ID: 19372319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size.
    Mannacio V; Di Tommaso L; De Amicis V; Stassano P; Vosa C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic root distensibility and cross-sectional areas in stented and subcoronary stentless bioprostheses in pigs.
    Funder JA; Ringgaard S; Frost MW; Wierup P; Klaaborg KE; Hjortdal V; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 20357011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implantation of aortic stentless bioprosthesis: case series.
    Sutlić Z; Unić D; Rudez I; Biocina B; Barić D; Kontić M
    Croat Med J; 2002 Dec; 43(6):649-51. PubMed ID: 12476470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for direct assessment of anatomic regurgitant orifice in mitral regurgitation.
    Buchner S; Debl K; Poschenrieder F; Feuerbach S; Riegger GA; Luchner A; Djavidani B
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Sep; 1(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 19808532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.