These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19808811)
1. Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England. Roland M; Elliott M; Lyratzopoulos G; Barbiere J; Parker RA; Smith P; Bower P; Campbell J BMJ; 2009 Sep; 339():b3851. PubMed ID: 19808811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol. Hocking JS; Temple-Smith M; van Driel M; Law M; Guy R; Bulfone L; Wood A; Low N; Donovan B; Fairley CK; Kaldor J; Gunn J Implement Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27624835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The carrot, the stick and the general practitioner: how have changes in financial incentives affected health promotion activity in general practice? Langham S; Gillam S; Thorogood M Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Dec; 45(401):665-8. PubMed ID: 8745865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited impact on patient experience of access of a pay for performance scheme in England in the first year. Addink RW; Bankart MJ; Murtagh GM; Baker R Eur J Gen Pract; 2011 Jun; 17(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 21303230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rationale for the new GP deprivation payment scheme in England: effects of moving from electoral ward to enumeration district underprivileged area scores. Bajekal M; Alves B; Jarman B; Hurwitz B Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Jun; 51(467):451-5. PubMed ID: 11407049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exempting dissenting patients from pay for performance schemes: retrospective analysis of exception reporting in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. Doran T; Kontopantelis E; Fullwood C; Lester H; Valderas JM; Campbell S BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2405. PubMed ID: 22511209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients' views of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study. Hannon KL; Lester HE; Campbell SM Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e322-8. PubMed ID: 22546591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals. Caley M; Burn S; Marshall T; Rouse A Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Jan; 64(618):e54-9. PubMed ID: 24567583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. Paddison C; Elliott M; Parker R; Staetsky L; Lyratzopoulos G; Campbell JL; Roland M BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 22626735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of financial incentives in Australian general practice. Kecmanovic M; Hall JP Med J Aust; 2015 May; 202(9):488-91. PubMed ID: 25971573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contract and ownership type of general practices and patient experience in England: multilevel analysis of a national cross-sectional survey. Cowling TE; Laverty AA; Harris MJ; Watt HC; Greaves F; Majeed A J R Soc Med; 2017 Nov; 110(11):440-451. PubMed ID: 29096580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counting the cost of social disadvantage in primary care: retrospective analysis of patient data. Worrall A; Rea JN; Ben-Shlomo Y BMJ; 1997 Jan; 314(7073):38-42. PubMed ID: 9001480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive on support for smoking cessation and on smoking prevalence among people with diabetes. Millett C; Gray J; Saxena S; Netuveli G; Majeed A CMAJ; 2007 Jun; 176(12):1705-10. PubMed ID: 17548383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inequalities in family practitioner use by sexual orientation: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. Urwin S; Whittaker W BMJ Open; 2016 May; 6(5):e011633. PubMed ID: 27173816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population health needs as predictors of variations in NHS practice payments: a cross-sectional study of English general practices in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Levene LS; Baker R; Wilson A; Walker N; Boomla K; Bankart MJ Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Jan; 67(654):e10-e19. PubMed ID: 27872085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How can health care organizations be reliably compared?: Lessons from a national survey of patient experience. Lyratzopoulos G; Elliott MN; Barbiere JM; Staetsky L; Paddison CA; Campbell J; Roland M Med Care; 2011 Aug; 49(8):724-33. PubMed ID: 21610543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The uptake of childhood immunization and financial incentives to general practitioners. Lynch ML Health Econ; 1994; 3(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 8044212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Mind the gap!" Evaluation of the performance gap attributable to exception reporting and target thresholds in the new GMS contract: National database analysis. Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Howe A BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jun; 8():131. PubMed ID: 18559086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study. Steel N; Maisey S; Clark A; Fleetcroft R; Howe A Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Jun; 57(539):449-54. PubMed ID: 17550669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]