These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19808922)
1. Validation of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-C) scale. Huang MF; Courtney M; Edwards H; McDowell J Diabetes Care; 2010 Jan; 33(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 19808922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the self-stigma scale in patients with type 2 diabetes. Kato A; Takada M; Hashimoto H Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Dec; 12():179. PubMed ID: 25495723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the short form of The Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID-5): a validation study. Vislapuu M; Broström A; Igland J; Vorderstrasse A; Iversen MM BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e022903. PubMed ID: 30796115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing Diabetes Distress Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Malaysia Using the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. Jannoo Z; Yap BW; Khan NM; Farcomeni A Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():159-164. PubMed ID: 31082796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (SG-PAID-C) among high-risk polypharmacy patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in Singapore. Siaw MY; Tai BB; Lee JY J Diabetes Investig; 2017 Mar; 8(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 27461266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Coping Measure scale. Huang MF; Courtney M; Edwards H; McDowell J J Nurs Scholarsh; 2009; 41(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 19941584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a reliable and valid Chinese version of the diabetes empowerment scale. Shiu AT; Wong RY; Thompson DR Diabetes Care; 2003 Oct; 26(10):2817-21. PubMed ID: 14514585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes. Chang SJ; Song M; Im EO J Clin Nurs; 2014 Aug; 23(15-16):2121-30. PubMed ID: 23876167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes (AR-PAID-5) scale. Sayed Ahmed HA; Mohamed SF; Mostafa M; Elotla SF; Shah A; Shah J; Fouad AM BMC Prim Care; 2022 Jun; 23(1):148. PubMed ID: 35681150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing and psychometric testing of a short-form problem areas in diabetes scale in chinese patients. Hsu HC; Chang YH; Lee PJ; Chen SY; Hsieh CH; Lee YJ; Wang RH J Nurs Res; 2013 Sep; 21(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 23958611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing and Psychometrically Testing the Functions of Diabetes Peer Support Group Scale. Chiou CJ; Huang HL; Lin YC; Wang RH J Nurs Res; 2016 Dec; 24(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 27846108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale: psychometric evaluation survey in a Greek sample with type 2 diabetes. Papathanasiou A; Koutsovasilis A; Shea S; Philalithis A; Papavasiliou S; Melidonis A; Lionis C J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2014 May; 21(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 22340071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore. Venkataraman K; Tan LS; Bautista DC; Griva K; Zuniga YL; Amir M; Lee YS; Lee J; Tai ES; Khoo EY; Wee HL PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136759. PubMed ID: 26336088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised (ASAS-R): Reliability and Validity Among Older Chinese People. Guo L; Zauszniewski JA; Ding X; Zhang L; Gao H; Guo Q; Liu K West J Nurs Res; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1459-1476. PubMed ID: 27703077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care. Sayed Ahmed HA; Mohamed SF; Elotla SF; Mostafa M; Shah J; Fouad AM Front Public Health; 2022; 10():843164. PubMed ID: 35284366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The psychometric testing of the diabetes health promotion self-care scale. Wang RH; Lin LY; Cheng CP; Hsu MT; Kao CC J Nurs Res; 2012 Jun; 20(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 22592107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing the Chinese version problem areas in diabetes-teen for measuring diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Lee SL; Wu LM; Chou YY; Lai FC; Lin SY J Pediatr Nurs; 2022; 64():143-150. PubMed ID: 35241357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Wang X; Lyu W; Aronson R; Li A; Lu G; Xu W; Cao Y; Yu Y; Wang L; Lin H Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jan; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 33472648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes. Van Der Ven NC; Weinger K; Yi J; Pouwer F; Adèr H; Van Der Ploeg HM; Snoek FJ Diabetes Care; 2003 Mar; 26(3):713-8. PubMed ID: 12610027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). Schmitt A; Reimer A; Kulzer B; Haak T; Ehrmann D; Hermanns N Diabet Med; 2016 Jun; 33(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 26287511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]