205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19810121)
1. Student laboratory presentations as a learning tool in anatomy education.
Chollet MB; Teaford MF; Garofalo EM; DeLeon VB
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):260-4. PubMed ID: 19810121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
Granger NA; Calleson D
Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections.
Nnodim JO; Ohanaka EC; Osuji CU
Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 8793221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing knowledge of human gross anatomy in medical school: an applied contextual-learning theory method.
Clough RW; Lehr RP
Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 8793222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection.
Yeager VL
Clin Anat; 1996; 9(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 8838283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory.
Brueckner JK; MacPherson BR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 May; 8(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 15059083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrating physical examination and trunk anatomy; a new course for second year medical students.
Adibi I; Hasani N; Ashoorioun V; Sadrearhami S; Monajemi AR
Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):975-7. PubMed ID: 18158675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Latin and Greek in gross anatomy.
Smith SB; Carmichael SW; Pawlina W; Spinner RJ
Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 16617443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching.
Johnson JH
Clin Anat; 2002 Jan; 15(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 11835543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of Web usage and exam performance in a human anatomy and development course.
Rizzolo LJ; Aden M; Stewart WB
Clin Anat; 2002 Aug; 15(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 12203379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using focus groups to assess presentation methods in a research seminar.
Thomas KJ; Lancaster C
J Allied Health; 2007; 36(4):e276-92. PubMed ID: 19759997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introducing clinical laboratory science: CLS students help shape the future.
Sawyer BG; Hubbard J; Rice-Spearman L
Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 19(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 17181124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Web-based materials to enhance anatomy instruction in the health sciences.
Granger NA; Calleson DC; Henson OW; Juliano E; Wineski L; McDaniel MD; Burgoon JM
Anat Rec B New Anat; 2006 Jul; 289(4):121-7. PubMed ID: 16865700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Near-peer driven dissection selective: A primer to the medical school anatomy course.
Cantwell S; Bonadurer GF; Pawlina W; Lachman N
Clin Anat; 2015 Nov; 28(8):985-93. PubMed ID: 26375596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomy curriculum for medical students: what can be learned for future curricula from evaluations and questionnaires completed by students, anatomists and clinicians in different countries?
Pabst R
Ann Anat; 2009 Dec; 191(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 19836220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a radiology-based teaching approach for gross anatomy in the digital era.
Marker DR; Bansal AK; Juluru K; Magid D
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1057-65. PubMed ID: 20447843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-athletic training students perform better on written tests with teacher-centered instruction.
Livecchi NM; Merrick MA; Ingersoll CD; Stemmans CL
J Allied Health; 2004; 33(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 15503754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of laboratory vs written examinations in an anatomy course.
Gill AA; Marmo NA; Shuster JJ
Am J Occup Ther; 1978 Jan; 32(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 629176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
