627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19810479)
1. The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.
Smith A; Gillin M; Bues M; Zhu XR; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Woo S; Lee A; Komaki R; Cox J; Hiramoto K; Akiyama H; Ishida T; Sasaki T; Matsuda K
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4068-83. PubMed ID: 19810479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary investigations for the option to use fast uniform scanning with compensators on a gantry designed for IMPT.
Zenklusen SM; Pedroni E; Meer D; Bula C; Safai S
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5208-16. PubMed ID: 21978065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A proton therapy system in Nagoya Proton Therapy Center.
Toshito T; Omachi C; Kibe Y; Sugai H; Hayashi K; Shibata H; Yasui K; Tanaka K; Yamamoto T; Yoshida A; Nikawa E; Asai K; Shimomura A; Okumura I; Suzuki T; Kinou H; Isoyama S; Ogino H; Iwata H; Shibamoto Y; Mizoe J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 39(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 27271800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a golden beam data set for the commissioning of a proton double-scattering system in a pencil-beam dose calculation algorithm.
Slopsema RL; Lin L; Flampouri S; Yeung D; Li Z; McDonough JE; Palta J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091710. PubMed ID: 25186385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization techniques for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a clinical case study.
Yeung D; McKenzie C; Indelicato DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2014 Jan; 61(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 24000229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of beam efficiency through the patient-specific collimator on secondary neutron dose equivalent in double scattering and uniform scanning modes of proton therapy.
Hecksel D; Anferov V; Fitzek M; Shahnazi K
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2910-7. PubMed ID: 20632602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility studies of a passive scatter proton therapy nozzle without a range modulator wheel.
Harvey MC; Polf JC; Smith AR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2243-52. PubMed ID: 18649454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial beam size study for passive scatter proton therapy. II. Changes in delivered depth dose profiles.
Polf JC; Harvey MC; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4219-22. PubMed ID: 18072486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between the lateral penumbra of a collimated double-scattered beam and uncollimated scanning beam in proton radiotherapy.
Safai S; Bortfeld T; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1729-50. PubMed ID: 18367800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston.
Gillin MT; Sahoo N; Bues M; Ciangaru G; Sawakuchi G; Poenisch F; Arjomandy B; Martin C; Titt U; Suzuki K; Smith AR; Zhu XR
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 20175477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the range shifter model for proton pencil-beam scanning for the Eclipse v.11 treatment planning system.
Matysiak W; Yeung D; Slopsema R; Li Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 27074461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commissioning of a clinical pencil beam scanning proton therapy unit for ultra-high dose rates (FLASH).
Nesteruk KP; Togno M; Grossmann M; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Schippers JM; Safai S; Meer D; Psoroulas S
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):4017-4026. PubMed ID: 33963576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial beam size study for passive scatter proton therapy. I. Monte Carlo verification.
Polf JC; Harvey MC; Titt U; Newhauser WD; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4213-8. PubMed ID: 18072485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commissioning and beam characterization of the first gantry-mounted accelerator pencil beam scanning proton system.
Kang M; Pang D
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3496-3510. PubMed ID: 31840264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4.
Grevillot L; Bertrand D; Dessy F; Freud N; Sarrut D
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5203-19. PubMed ID: 21791731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing mini-ridge filter thickness to reduce proton treatment times in a spot-scanning synchrotron system.
Courneyea L; Beltran C; Tseung HS; Yu J; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061713. PubMed ID: 24877808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurements of neutron dose equivalent for a proton therapy center using uniform scanning proton beams.
Zheng Y; Liu Y; Zeidan O; Schreuder AN; Keole S
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3484-92. PubMed ID: 22755728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fan-beam intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hill P; Westerly D; Mackie T
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111704. PubMed ID: 24320412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
