528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19812651)
1. Measures urgently required to prevent multiple submissions.
Molaei G
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7265):723. PubMed ID: 19812651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Journals lack explicit policies for separating eds from ads.
Giles J
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):549. PubMed ID: 15800585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple publication reconsidered.
Fulda JS
J Infor Ethics; 1998; 7(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 17078180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all].
Staff A; Rørtveit G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How honest can a medical journal be?
Groves T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 16441685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Duplicate submission, redundant publication and plagiarism are under control].
Léger P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Jun; 110(3):125-6. PubMed ID: 19481679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The ATS Journals' policy on image manipulation.
Abraham E; Adler KB; Shapiro SD; Leff AR
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2008 Nov; 39(5):499. PubMed ID: 18927351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review and the nursing literature.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The ARRIVE guidelines: a resource for authors and reviewers to ensure that submissions to The Veterinary Journal meet minimal expectations of completeness, accuracy and transparency.
Blomme EA
Vet J; 2011 Sep; 189(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 21924210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Replication publication.
Patterson M; Cardon L
PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e327. PubMed ID: 16149852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reviewing for journals: ask not what your profession can do for you but what you can do for your profession.
Steers WD
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1597. PubMed ID: 16600708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
