136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19812772)
1. A new test statistic based on shrunken sample variance for identifying differentially expressed genes in small microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Bioinform Biol Insights; 2008 Feb; 2():145-56. PubMed ID: 19812772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
Hirakawa A; Sato Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Cancer Inform; 2008 Jan; 3():140-8. PubMed ID: 19455258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
Gao X
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methods for identifying differentially expressed genes across multiple conditions from microarray data.
Tan Y; Liu Y
Bioinformation; 2011; 7(8):400-4. PubMed ID: 22347782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bootstrapping of gene-expression data improves and controls the false discovery rate of differentially expressed genes.
Meuwissen TH; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(2):191-205. PubMed ID: 15040898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
Jiao S; Zhang S
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of differentially expressed genes using multi-resolution wavelet transformation analysis combined with SAM.
Wu Y; Zhang L; Liu L; Zhang Y; Yi D
Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 22906473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis.
Hackstadt AJ; Hess AM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():11. PubMed ID: 19133141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size calculation for microarray experiments with blocked one-way design.
Jung SH; Sohn I; George SL; Feng L; Leppert PC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 10():164. PubMed ID: 19476634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal tests shrinking both means and variances applicable to microarray data analysis.
Hwang JT; Liu P
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article36. PubMed ID: 20887275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ranking analysis of microarray data: a powerful method for identifying differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD; Fornage M; Fu YX
Genomics; 2006 Dec; 88(6):846-854. PubMed ID: 16979869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EVE (external variance estimation) increases statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes.
Wille A; Gruissem W; Bühlmann P; Hennig L
Plant J; 2007 Nov; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 17680783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.
Cui X; Hwang JT; Qiu J; Blades NJ; Churchill GA
Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15618528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A robust statistical procedure to discover expression biomarkers using microarray genomic expression data.
Zou YY; Yang J; Zhu J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Aug; 7(8):603-7. PubMed ID: 16845711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
