These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19813165)

  • 1. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?
    Grobman WA; Lai Y; Landon MB; Spong CY; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 26(10):693-701. PubMed ID: 19813165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.
    Liao Q; Luo J; Zheng L; Han Q; Liu Z; Qi W; Yang T; Yan J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):639. PubMed ID: 33081753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting VBAC success: from theory to clinical practice.
    Blackwell SC
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 26(10):691-2. PubMed ID: 19842075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the interval since vaginal delivery influence the chance of vaginal birth after cesarean?
    Miller ES; Grobman WA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):294-7. PubMed ID: 25586319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission.
    Metz TD; Stoddard GJ; Henry E; Jackson M; Holmgren C; Esplin S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 122(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 23921867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].
    Guo N; Bai RM; Qu PF; Huang P; He YP; Wang CL; Mi Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):369-374. PubMed ID: 31262120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study.
    Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simplifying the prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: role of the cervical exam.
    Oakes MC; Hensel DM; Kelly JC; Rampersad R; Carter EB; Cahill AG; Raghuraman N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):10030-10035. PubMed ID: 35723653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
    Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
    Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
    Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean?
    Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
    Cegolon L; Mastrangelo G; Maso G; Dal Pozzo G; Ronfani L; Cegolon A; Heymann WC; Barbone F
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):380. PubMed ID: 31941963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.
    Zhang HL; Zheng LH; Cheng LC; Liu ZD; Yu L; Han Q; Miao GY; Yan JY
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):538. PubMed ID: 32933509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for vaginal delivery after cesarean and its pregnancy outcomes-Based on a prospective study.
    Lin J; Hou Y; Ke Y; Zeng W; Gu W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():114-121. PubMed ID: 31580963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal birth after cesarean: Does accuracy of predicted success change from prenatal intake to admission?
    Ha TK; Rao RR; Maykin MM; Mei JY; Havard AL; Gaw SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 May; 2(2):100094. PubMed ID: 33345960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients.
    Wen J; Song X; Ding H; Shen X; Shen R; Hu LQ; Long W
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3084. PubMed ID: 29449665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Grobman WA; Lai Y; Landon MB; Spong CY; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):806-12. PubMed ID: 17400840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.