355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19813206)
1. Linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles.
Stock MS; Beck TW; Defreitas JM; Dillon MA
Muscle Nerve; 2010 Mar; 41(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 19813206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linearity and reliability of the EMG amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles.
Stock MS; Beck TW; DeFreitas JM; Dillon MA
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 20405785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses to repeated concentric muscle actions of the quadriceps femoris.
Ebersole KT; O'Connor KM; Wier AP
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16139522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An examination of the frequency-specific behavior of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus isometric torque relationship.
Beck TW
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 49(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 19280798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanomyographic responses of the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles to incremental isometric muscle actions.
Coburn JW; Malek MH; Brown LE; Zinder SM
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 48(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 18435213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MMG and EMG responses during 25 maximal, eccentric, isokinetic muscle actions.
Perry-Rana SR; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Bull AJ; Cramer JT
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2048-54. PubMed ID: 14652501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-correlation analyses of mechanomyographic signals from the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles during concentric and eccentric isokinetic muscle actions.
Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Weir JP; Ebersole KT; Perry-Rana SR; Bull AJ; Johnson GO
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 12964257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mechanomyographic frequency-based fatigue threshold test.
Hendrix CR; Housh TJ; Zuniga JM; Camic CL; Mielke M; Johnson GO; Schmidt RJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Mar; 187(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19945484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-individual variability among the mechanomyographic and electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp muscle actions.
Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ; Stout JR
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2007; 47(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 17557649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MMG and EMG responses during fatiguing isokinetic muscle contractions at different velocities.
Perry-Rana SR; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Bull AJ; Berning JM; Cramer JT
Muscle Nerve; 2002 Sep; 26(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 12210366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A wavelet-based analysis of surface mechanomyographic signals from the quadriceps femoris.
Beck TW; Housh TJ; Fry AC; Cramer JT; Weir JP; Schilling BK; Falvo MJ; Moore CA
Muscle Nerve; 2009 Mar; 39(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 19208397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Oct; 14(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 15301774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanomyographic and electromyographic amplitude and frequency responses from the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles during maximal, eccentric isokinetic muscle actions.
Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Weir JP; Johnson GO; Berning JM; Perry SR; Bull AJ
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Sep; 42(6):337-46. PubMed ID: 12224471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a piezoelectric contact sensor and an accelerometer for examining mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus torque relationships during isokinetic and isometric muscle actions of the biceps brachii.
Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Weir JP; Cramer JT; Coburn JW; Malek MH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Aug; 16(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 16243542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An examination of cross-talk among surface mechanomyographic signals from the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles during isometric muscle actions.
Beck TW; DeFreitas JM; Stock MS
Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Apr; 29(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 20334943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp vs. step muscle actions.
Ryan ED; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ; Stout JR; Housh TJ; Cramer JT
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):293-305. PubMed ID: 18061275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanomyographic time and frequency domain responses of the vastus medialis muscle during submaximal to maximal isometric and isokinetic muscle actions.
Coburn JW; Housh TJ; Cramer JT; Weir JP; Miller JM; Beck TW; Malek MH; Johnson GO
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 44(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 15224821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-individual variability in the torque-related patterns of responses for mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency.
Ryan ED; Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Beck TW; Herda TJ; Hartman MJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Apr; 161(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 17187865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Torque-related changes in mechanomyographic intensity patterns for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles.
Beck TW; Stock MS; Defreitas JM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 May; 17(7):714-22. PubMed ID: 22920285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender, muscle, and velocity comparisons of mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses during isokinetic muscle actions.
Cramer JT; Housh TJ; Weir JP; Johnson GO; Berning JM; Perry SR; Bull AJ
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2004 Apr; 14(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 15043634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
